OPERS keeps it simple and succeeds

Brad Tillberg, chief investment officer of the $8.7 billion Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) is only the second chief investment officer in the fund’s 45-year history. Perhaps even more remarkable, OPERS’ 13-member investment board, responsible for overseeing strategy and manager selection, has had only two chairs in more than 30 years.

This stability has brought a continuity and consistency to the fund’s leadership. Strategy continues to prioritise traditional investments, with passive strategies in equities and bonds, over private markets and active, skills-based investment.

In the latest rebalancing of the portfolio, assets have been split between US stocks (recently reduced to 40 per cent), international stocks (increased to 28 per cent) and domestic bonds (32 per cent). It’s a no-frills approach that Tillberg says still does exactly what it is meant to do.

The fund’s asset allocation is decided according to three main themes: asset allocation is the key determinant of risk and return of the overall fund; diversify by both asset class and within asset classes; and passive funds are suitable investment strategies.

No need for alternatives or private markets

“I don’t believe we are a conservative fund; we are a traditional fund,” Tillberg says in an interview from the fund’s Oklahoma City headquarters. “Conservative implies there is no risk in the portfolio and we do have risk, because we need this to reach our assumed rate of return. However, we are lucky because we have not been subject to the competing philosophies that come with leadership changes.

Sponsored Content

“You can have a portfolio that gets you to where you want to go without having to go into alternatives or private markets, and our board is extraordinarily sensitive to fees. We can do what we want to do with a traditional portfolio and the results speak for themselves.”

The fund has returned 9.41 per cent in the fiscal year to date, while the 10-year annualised return is 5.92 per cent as of the end of March 2017. Fees come in at 9-13 basis points, Tillberg says.

OPERS administers two defined benefit plans and two defined contribution plans. The largest defined benefit plan is the system’s namesake, the OPERS fund.

The system uses indexing for its domestic equity mandates (the Russell 1000, and Russell 2000 – the large OPERS fund doesn’t use the Russell 2000), its international equity mandates (MSCI All Country World Index ex-US and MSCI ACWI ex-US Growth), and its fixed-income mandates (US Treasury Inflation-Protected Security Index), with BlackRock now providing the four passive mandates for the OPERS fund.

The fund also has nine pure play long-only active managers in US small-cap equity and fixed income, plus three “in-the-hand” index managers, where Tillberg keeps a close eye on tracking errors.

“We emphasise beta exposure and diversification,” he explains. “We de-emphasise active management at the fund level, but we maintain selectivity in areas where we do employ active management. It’s a philosophy that allows us to control the things we can control.”

About 42 per cent of the US equity exposure, 68 per cent of the international equity allocation and 11 per cent of the fixed-income allocation is indexed.

Publicly traded markets mute risk

The manager roster comes to 16, while back in Oklahoma City, Tillberg is a one-man investment team, although he is quick to highlight the importance of the fund’s investment consultant and, of course, the board in decision-making.

“The level of sophistication on our board is strong,” he says. “Our investments are managed with a healthy dose of common sense and that goes a long way. We have the discipline to know what we can and can’t control, understand that the decisions we make have a big impact, and know the importance of maintaining discipline throughout market cycle.”

He also argues that keeping it simple reduces risk.

Like all large institutional investors, OPERS’ risk exposure runs the gamut from interest rate risk to currency and liquidity risk and geopolitical risk. Yet because the fund’s entire exposure is either to publicly traded markets or in vehicles where the underlying investment is publicly traded, risk is also muted.

“This transparency really serves as an additional risk-control function for us and I think this is probably unappreciated in the market,” Tillberg says. “Our portfolio is marked to market every day. By avoiding private markets, we [avoid having to] worry about operational issues like valuation methodologies and concentration in fund holdings, or structural fund risks or key man risk or cash drags or leverage usage. We are geared towards equity beta, no doubt about it, but also hold sizeable fixed income that dampens that volatility.”

OPERS’s success with such a straightforward approach has made Tillberg sceptical of more innovative investment styles.

“Buyers should approach innovative investment products with scepticism,” he argues. “One could have a highly effective portfolio with everything that exists today. One could also get into a lot of trouble with everything that exists today. It is our job as fiduciary investors to understand where a product fits within the portfolio and not just buy the latest product.”

Does he plan to introduce more active strategies, given today’s expensive equity markets and predicted low returns?

“We’re doing just fine at a fraction of the cost,” he concludes.

Leave a Comment

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

In an environment where multiple risks are emerging and their effects are compounding on the portfolio, CPP Investments' chief risk officer Priti Singh says the $572 billion fund is rethinking risk management from the ground up, shifting from reaction to preparation and embedding risk thinking earlier in investment decisions. She speaks to Amanda White about the fund's risk approach.

Sort content by

Why West Virginia’s CIO is worried about its China divestment directive

The $28 billion West Virginia Investment Management Board will divest from Chinese state-owned companies and CIO Craig Slaughter has reservations about the decision. He outlines in an interview with Top1000funds.com about why the directive is an extension of a big threat facing investors: a decline in liberal democracy. 

TRS strikes gold: Tiny allocation crushes its benchmark

This year, TRS doubled its tiny allocation to gold via a special fund that buys gold ETFs and mining companies. The strategy returned nearly 60 per cent, thanks to market conditions including inflation, geopolitics, government debt levels and de-dollarisation pushing gold higher.

LGPS Central doubles in size; looks to add more alternatives

In a rare interview, Jayne Atkinson, chief investment officer of the £100 billion ($132 billion) UK pool LGPS Central, reveals the plan to scale up its offering after almost doubling its assets under management, including expanding alternatives to new allocations in hedge funds, diversified growth funds and insurance-linked securities.

CalPERS bets on outperformance from growing climate allocation

CalPERS' Peter Cashion tells Top1000funds.com how the pension fund's strategy to allocate to climate mitigation, transition and adaptation strategies is allowing it to access an untapped corner of the US market where many investors have retreated because of the policy environment.

Alaska’s APFC mulls the positives of growing its small crypto exposure

The $84 billion Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation is weighing the benefits and risks of increasing its less than 1 per cent allocation to cryptocurrency following positive returns for the sovereign wealth fund. Despite the current policy tailwinds, the investor is wary about the asset class's liquidity and value drivers. 

TPA just a new acronym for ‘common sense’: Pennsylvania PSERS CIO

As CalPERS becomes the first US pension fund to adopt a total portfolio approach, Ben Cotton, CIO of $80 billion Pennsylvania PSERS suggests TPA is just another acronym for something investors should already be doing: making decisions for what is best for the whole portfolio.

Previous