Is LDI fit for purpose?

In 2007, the C$94 billion Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP) moved to a liability-driven investing approach, which included a large allocation to bonds and a lot of internal investment management. The approach helped the fund survive the global financial crisis and has served it well for the past 13 years. But now – with the COVID crisis and a very low interest rate environment – that approach is being revisited and the fund is looking to invest more in alpha generating assets.

“In 2007 we shifted to a liability driven approach and had a major allocation to long-term bonds which served us well through the GFC,” says Jeff Wendling, who joined the fund in 1998 and became CEO in April this year.

“Over all those years it also limited the volatility of our surplus, and did a good job of having our assets match our liabilities. That has worked out well through the 13 or so years, but now yields are very low so we are asking two things: does the liability driven strategy still make sense? And how do we build a portfolio that will generate the returns to keep HOOPP fully funded over the long term. Bonds won’t do that for us the same way they have in the past.”

The evolution of this liability-driven investment approach (known as LDI 2.0) is the exploration of what to invest in when interest rates are so low. Wendling says there is no doubt the fund will hold less bonds than it has in the past. In 2009 the fund moved from a traditional 60:40 equities/bond mix to a split of roughly 45:55 and it’s been there ever since.

“We are going to hold fewer bonds in the future. They provide minimal returns right now and also less risk mitigation benefits to the growth in our liabilities,” Wendling says. “Bonds helped us in 2008/09 during the GFC but I don’t think they will act so well if we have difficult markets going forward, so we will hold less bonds.”

Instead the fund is looking to invest in more return seeking assets – in particular increasing allocations to equities, real estate and infrastructure, which the fund is relatively late to compared with its Canadian peers.

Sponsored Content

“We will invest in more bond-like assets with higher returns such as high dividend-yielding equities. We are also looking for more alpha-generating, uncorrelated sources of return through either internal or external management, and more international diversification. All of that, we think, will help generate returns that we are not getting from our bond holdings.”

The fund started 2020 in a strong position having returned 17 per cent last year, and did buy risky assets in March and April, adding to equities, credit and provincial bond positions pushing assets to an all-time high of C$100 billion.

HOOPP launched its infrastructure program in 2019, coming late to the asset class by Canadian standards. The substantial bond holdings had served that role, but now with bonds decreasing, infrastructure is getting a look in.

The fund is managing its C$1 billion commitments to infrastructure through an internal team and is looking for some select relationships.

“This is a key asset that we think will replace some of those bonds that just aren’t yielding us the returns that we need right now,” Wendling says. “It’s going to be an important part of our assets.”

Overall in private assets HOOPP has a 25 per cent allocation, compared with some of its Canadian peers which have half their assets in private investments, so there is room to grow in private equity and real estate too.

“Those assets also have some of the hedging characteristics we look to hedge liabilities and inflation hedging aspects as well,” he says.

In terms of ongoing risk, inflation has always been something the fund has considered in a meaningful way.

The HOOPP pension benefit is based on employees’ best five years of earnings so if there is wage inflation the fund’s liabilities increase.

“We do want to look at having assets that can perform well in a higher inflationary environment. In our stress testing approach we do test severe shocks including inflation shocks,” Wendling says. “It’s a tough question at the moment and we’ve never had wider range of views on it. Inflation right now has been very well behaved and under shot what policy makers were looking for. We think it will remain pretty well behaved but the reflationary measures of policymakers will mean it will definitely lead to higher inflation, that will happen in the longer term. In a nearer time frame we think it will behave the same way it has in the past couple of years.”

HOOPP has used derivatives for a long time as a way of mitigating risks, including tail risks, but also as a way of getting its equities exposures.

By investing in derivatives it allows the capital to be invested in long-term bonds for example, Wendling says.

“Derivatives as an approach is a key part of our long-term success and will continue to be so,” he says. “We have always been very strong risk managers. The fund is getting larger, more complex and more international and we need to be constantly improving and working out our risk management capabilities.

HOOPP was one of the very early funds to go to internal investment management and move away from external management, and in a sign that the fund is looking at all aspects of the way it invests, that is now under review too.

“That has served us well and where we did use external managers it was generally in private equity. As we go forward I think trying to generate the returns we need we will be looking at new strategies, new absolute return strategies for example and will use external managers where we can in a selective way to find more diversified sources of return. We will still be largely internally managed but not as much as it has been in the past.”

Leave a Comment

Why NYC pensions CIO hasn’t drunk the ‘TPA Kool-Aid’

Why NYC pensions CIO hasn’t drunk the ‘TPA Kool-Aid’

Three decades of investing have given Monte Tarbox sharp eyes for recognising risk and opportunities, and he’s putting it to use as the new permanent chief investment officer of the $306 billion NYC Bureau of Asset Management. In an interview with Top1000funds.com, Tarbox outlines his vision for the fund, why he’s bullish on infrastructure but “nervous” on PE, and why he hasn’t drunk the TPA “Kool-Aid”.

Sort content by

Private asset funds are no longer fit-for-purpose

The surging interest in generative AI has triggered a technological arms race, driving demand for data centres. Investors are looking to capitalise on what is often described as a generational opportunity, but as Blue Owl’s James Clarke cautions, there are several important factors to assess in partners for the long-term.

PRI slashes reporting burden to preserve code relevance among signatories

The Principles for Responsible Investment will reduce signatories’ responsibilities in their annual mandatory reporting from 240 questions to just 40 next year. The outgoing PRI chief David Atkin explains the move and why asset owners have a big role in stabilising the discussion around responsible investment. 

LGPS Central doubles in size; looks to add more alternatives

In a rare interview, Jayne Atkinson, chief investment officer of the £100 billion ($132 billion) UK pool LGPS Central, reveals the plan to scale up its offering after almost doubling its assets under management, including expanding alternatives to new allocations in hedge funds, diversified growth funds and insurance-linked securities.

NBIM dethrones GPIF to become the world’s largest asset owner

Norway’s sovereign wealth fund is now the world’s largest asset owner according to the Thinking Ahead Institute's annual Asset Owner 100 report, which also outlines the similarities and challenges among top capital allocators globally. 

Sweden’s AP2 and AP6 conflict over PE investments

The Swedish government’s plans to streamline the country’s pension system and merge the $8 billion buffer fund AP6 with its larger and more diversified sibling, the $48 billion AP2, have hit a bump in the road. Major points of contention include AP6's large private equity exposures and staff integration. 

Iceland’s pension funds: Consolidation continues but size of sector a worry

Merger mania continues to grip Iceland’s pension sector, but economies of scale and greater efficiency don't solve the problem of the size of an industry now larger than the country's banking system and insurance sector combined, and more than sufficient to buy all listed investments.

Previous