CalPERS: Lessons from CIO departure

The CalPERS board is considering whether to require a new CIO to transfer all of their personal stock holdings into a blind trust while they are a CalPERS’ employee. The move follows the resignation of Ben Meng as CIO last year after an ethics investigation related to some of his personal investments.

In an interview at the Conexus Financial Chair Forum, President of CalPERS Henry Jones said there had been lessons from the experience of Ben’s departure and the board was discussing whether a blind trust was appropriate for the CIO going forward.

CalPERS requires all senior employees to declare their personal investments via a form 700, and to recuse themselves from any decisions around investments they may hold.

Jones said following Meng’s departure the board now shares the responsibility of hiring the fund CIO with the CEO, Marcie Frost. In addition the CEO is required to keep the board informed of any form 700 concerns.

“Hiring a new CIO is an area of high priority for CalPERS right now, we have had multiple CIOs over the past few years,” Jones said. “The experience has changed the governance process and how the board and CEO work together to hire the next candidate. One thing I have to say upfront is our CEO was very transparent with the board in the hiring of Ben Meng and equally so last year when Ben decided to resign.”

Jones said the right candidate would not only have the right investment qualifications but also experience in the public arena.

Sponsored Content

“The board is focused on the qualifications needed to run a fund of CalPERS’ size, but not only do we need a CIO with the right mix of investment experience, we need a leader who is up to the challenge of being in the spotlight of this very public position.”

Selecting a new CIO is one of two key priorities for the CalPERS board in 2021. The other is the asset liability study which is conducted every four years and includes assessment of the fund’s risk appetite and appropriate strategic asset allocation.

“Our CEO shared our calendar year return of 12.4 per cent at our January board meeting, which was different from our fiscal year return and shows our investment strategy is working,” Jones says. “Much of our focus this year is on the four-year cyclical ALM study and the process will take a fresh look at capital market conditions, our liabilities and risk appetite, and the investment opportunity set available to us as a long-term investor.”

He said the board’s next step was to select a new strategic asset allocation that offers the best risk and return trade-offs. Private equity, which has been a big focus for the fund, will continue to be part of that mix.

The ALM process may also result in the selection of a new policy benchmark and a change to the targeted discount rate, currently at 7 per cent.

The CalPERS board is made up of 13 members and every two years adopts a self-evaluation process.

In the last evaluation, ideas around improved governance, effectiveness and oversight of the system were identified across five areas: board curriculum, roles and responsibilities, meeting materials, code of conduct, and insight tools.

“We have had a few accomplishments already to strengthen the board education program and held five workshops in the last fiscal year,” he said. “Last summer while the US saw a lot of unrest around racism, we held a workshop on unconscious bias and that’s a good example of how the board remains current on relevant subject matters that impact our members.”

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

In an environment where multiple risks are emerging and their effects are compounding on the portfolio, CPP Investments' chief risk officer Priti Singh says the $572 billion fund is rethinking risk management from the ground up, shifting from reaction to preparation and embedding risk thinking earlier in investment decisions. She speaks to Amanda White about the fund's risk approach.

Sort content by

ESG alpha solution
in a labyrinth

More than 1000 asset owners and service providers have signed up to the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment, and yet the question on everyone’s lips remains how to actually integrate sustainability into the investment process and ultimately add alpha. Bill Mills, managing partner of Highland Good Steward Management, has an idea and a platform

PGGM goes one step further

The €109-billion PGGM has been one of the global leaders in allocating assets according to ESG criteria. Now it is taking the philosophy one step further and aims to measure how all of its investments have a positive influence on the state of the world by measuring “sustainable returns”. The Dutch pension-fund service provider claims

NBIM approaches water with a filter

Water and how a company manages its exposure to this increasingly scarce resource is a key focus for Norway’s sovereign wealth fund in assessing the environmental and social performance of the more than 8000 companies in its portfolio. Anne Kvam, the head of Norges Bank Investment Management’s (NBIM) corporate governance team, says the sheer size

HOOPPla! The balance sheet is an asset

Jim Keohane’s first annual results as chief executive of HOOPP have been satisfying. The fund returned 12.19 per cent in 2011, a result well above its peers. It is 103-per-cent funded, and has reached assets of more than $40 billion for the first time. However, he says the unique investment approach and structure that has

Maryland boldly seeks return to full funding

Tackling the 65-per-cent-funded status of the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System has resulted in the bold political move to boost employee contributions while a long-term plan to increase allocations to private markets is part of a push to hit the system’s 7.75-per-cent-return target. The system is more than 10 per cent below the average

African fund invests for returns and development

Returns should not be the sole driver of investment decisions as funds should consider the social, environmental and economic impact their capital can have, a senior official at Africa’s largest pension fund says. John Oliphant, head of actuarial and investments at South Africa’s $130-billion Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF), says the fund considers high impact

Previous