CalPERS: Lessons from CIO departure

The CalPERS board is considering whether to require a new CIO to transfer all of their personal stock holdings into a blind trust while they are a CalPERS’ employee. The move follows the resignation of Ben Meng as CIO last year after an ethics investigation related to some of his personal investments.

In an interview at the Conexus Financial Chair Forum, President of CalPERS Henry Jones said there had been lessons from the experience of Ben’s departure and the board was discussing whether a blind trust was appropriate for the CIO going forward.

CalPERS requires all senior employees to declare their personal investments via a form 700, and to recuse themselves from any decisions around investments they may hold.

Jones said following Meng’s departure the board now shares the responsibility of hiring the fund CIO with the CEO, Marcie Frost. In addition the CEO is required to keep the board informed of any form 700 concerns.

“Hiring a new CIO is an area of high priority for CalPERS right now, we have had multiple CIOs over the past few years,” Jones said. “The experience has changed the governance process and how the board and CEO work together to hire the next candidate. One thing I have to say upfront is our CEO was very transparent with the board in the hiring of Ben Meng and equally so last year when Ben decided to resign.”

Jones said the right candidate would not only have the right investment qualifications but also experience in the public arena.

Sponsored Content

“The board is focused on the qualifications needed to run a fund of CalPERS’ size, but not only do we need a CIO with the right mix of investment experience, we need a leader who is up to the challenge of being in the spotlight of this very public position.”

Selecting a new CIO is one of two key priorities for the CalPERS board in 2021. The other is the asset liability study which is conducted every four years and includes assessment of the fund’s risk appetite and appropriate strategic asset allocation.

“Our CEO shared our calendar year return of 12.4 per cent at our January board meeting, which was different from our fiscal year return and shows our investment strategy is working,” Jones says. “Much of our focus this year is on the four-year cyclical ALM study and the process will take a fresh look at capital market conditions, our liabilities and risk appetite, and the investment opportunity set available to us as a long-term investor.”

He said the board’s next step was to select a new strategic asset allocation that offers the best risk and return trade-offs. Private equity, which has been a big focus for the fund, will continue to be part of that mix.

The ALM process may also result in the selection of a new policy benchmark and a change to the targeted discount rate, currently at 7 per cent.

The CalPERS board is made up of 13 members and every two years adopts a self-evaluation process.

In the last evaluation, ideas around improved governance, effectiveness and oversight of the system were identified across five areas: board curriculum, roles and responsibilities, meeting materials, code of conduct, and insight tools.

“We have had a few accomplishments already to strengthen the board education program and held five workshops in the last fiscal year,” he said. “Last summer while the US saw a lot of unrest around racism, we held a workshop on unconscious bias and that’s a good example of how the board remains current on relevant subject matters that impact our members.”

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

In an environment where multiple risks are emerging and their effects are compounding on the portfolio, CPP Investments' chief risk officer Priti Singh says the $572 billion fund is rethinking risk management from the ground up, shifting from reaction to preparation and embedding risk thinking earlier in investment decisions. She speaks to Amanda White about the fund's risk approach.

Sort content by

CalPERS grapples with new allocation targets

Implementing the asset allocation changes of a very large portfolio, particularly in private markets, is a conundrum CalPERS is dealing with as it moves its asset allocation and decides how to fill new private market allocations.   In February this year the $283 billion CalPERS investment committee approved a new strategic asset allocation which will

Qsuper’s permanent revolution

The evolution of the $43 billion QSuper’s offer to all members is definitely not at an end. In fact, Rosemary Vilgan, chief executive of QSuper, sitting in the board room of QSuper’s on the top floor of its Brisbane office, archly states: “I keep saying to people you should not work here if you do

Risks are multi-faceted and evolving: Litterman

If Robert Litterman were a CIO of a public pension plan he would not try to hit an “unrealistic return target”. Amanda White speaks to him about risk, quants, asset allocation and climate change. There is a serious problem with US public pension funds and the “unrealistic commitments and unrealistic return targets” they have set,

Harvard’s sustainability plan

Last month Harvard Management Company was the first US university endowment to sign the PRI. It has also appointed its first vice president of sustainable investing as it seeks to incorporate ESG considerations in its decision making. So how is HMC integrating ESG in its portfolio?   Harvard University has taken a stand for sustainability.

Better beta bets pay off for UTAM

The $6.6 billion University of Toronto Asset Management made some significant active tilts last year resulting in the return on the university’s main portfolio exceeding target return by about 10 per cent. Amanda White spoke to president and chief executive, Bill Moriarty.   Last year was a reasonably easy environment in which to make better

UPS pension fund’s opportunistic future

The United Parcel Service corporate pension fund is finalising an asset liability study this year which will result in a new strategic asset allocation. The $28 billion US fund, typically has a lower allocation to fixed income than its peers and has a reasonably aggressive portfolio for a corporate defined benefit fund. It is a

Previous