The road ahead for sustainability

David Blood, who co-founded Generation Investment Management with former vice president of the US, Al Gore, has outlined five priorities to focus the sustainable investment effort on over the next five years.

“We need to step up our efforts in the next three to five years no matter who gets into power in the US,” he says.

“We don’t have nearly enough capital in the transition to [a] low carbon economy. It’s not just renewable energy, everything will change.”

Speaking at the PRI in Person conference in Singapore last week, Blood said that the framework around sustainable investing rests on two things:

  1. The macro environment and the drivers of change – such as the environment, climate change, poverty, health, and demographics – are becoming more intense, and interlinked and so more relevant to business and investors
  2. From a business point of view, the issues of reputation, brand and resource management are becoming more relevant.

Generation, which was formed 12 years ago, is anchored in the philosophy that sustainability is best practice and makes the group better investors.

“Categorically we believe that the integration of sustainability makes us better investors,” Blood says.

Sponsored Content

“The more we prove the business case, the more it says it’s a fiduciary duty to do so, it will become mainstream.”

“Over the past 12 years the macro backdrop is increasingly important, and the integration of sustainability into investment practices and philosophy is best practice. Dumping a lot of oil into the Gulf of Mexico is bad for your stock price; reputation clearly matters,” he says.

“Companies that minimise the use of resources and maximise the resources they have will do better.”

In his keynote speech at the PRI conference Blood listed priorities for the next five years in order to progress sustainability integration.

  1. Win the battle, or debate, on fiduciary duty.

“Many investors say that fiduciary duty precludes them from looking at sustainability or ESG [environmental, social and governance], that is wrong,” he says.

Change the debate from why integrate, to how you integrate sustainability into investment practices. This includes looking at reporting, fiduciary duty, increasing the number of firms actively integrating sustainability, and looking across asset classes, not just equities.

  1. Recruit the other 50 per cent of managers to integrate sustainability, not just the people attending, or signed up to, the PRI.

“We’re good at convening those that agree,” he says. “Asset owners are key to bringing the other investment managers along the journey.”

  1. The transition to a low carbon economy is a big deal, and it has to happen now.

“If we are still talking about this in 10 years then we’ve missed it. Must make it critical, we need consistency of data.”

  1. The industry needs to recognise that finance and capitalism is not working for everyone. There is significant inequality and people are upset about it.

“Most people in the world have no idea we are integrating sustainability in finance. The finance industry is close to losing its licence to operate.”

“Most people outside of finance don’t differentiate between hedge funds, asset managers, asset owners, pension funds – they are all lumped in one bucket,” he says.

“We need to put the ‘social’ in the front of our agendas, impact investing as an extension and encourage companies to think about social issues. We have done a pretty good job on the ‘environmental’ and ‘governance’ but not great on the social.”

“It concerns me that of the top 25 asset managers in the world, about 50 per cent are here, but those that are not here are mostly American,” he told the PRI in Person audience.

“In the US, sustainable and responsible investing is seen as a political agenda and not really investing. We need to make the business case for it to win the argument,” he says.

 

Leave a Comment

Building portfolio resilience in the face of uncertainty

Building portfolio resilience in the face of uncertainty

As the multitude of macro-economic risks influence market conditions in unpredictable and unprecedented ways, CIOs are facing the most challenging and interesting times in their careers. A group of investors came together in London to shareideas on how to best assess risk and position their funds for the challenges and opportunities in this increasingly demanding market.

Sort content by

When does momentum shift to a risky bet?

Two finance professors at the London School of Economics have introduced a new way to measure the amount of risk arbitrage in markets. Their novel measure, dubbed “comomentum”, exploits time variation in how momentum stocks excessively “comove” together to reveal how crowded the classic price momentum trading strategy is at any point in time. They

Long-term investors should favour value: LSE academics prove why

The ultimate combination of value and momentum strategies depends on the investors’ time horizon, with a new institutional theory rationally explaining these anomalies by investor flows. Dimitri Vayanos, professor of finance at the London School of Economics explains why this theory can add to the practical debate of what is the best asset mix for

LSE fiduciary investor think tank

Investors were challenged to think differently about their portfolios by the latest academic thinking from the London School of Economics at a one-day investment roundtable in London last week.   Chief investment officers from UK and European public and corporate pension funds convened at the London School of Economics for a highly interactive one-day investment

Stanford professors challenge thinking

Investors were challenged to think differently about their portfolios by the latest academic thinking from Stanford University at a one-day investment roundtable in California last week. Chief investment officers from US public and corporate pension funds, endowments and foundations convened at Menlo Park, the home of Stanford University, for a one-day investment think-tank. Three finance

PE LPs overweighting home-state is hurting returns

New research finds institutional investors favour investing in private equity general partners that are located in the same state as their organisation. This is intuitive as local knowledge and contacts attract investments. However research from Stanford University finds this bias is coming at a large cost – about $1.2 billion a year – particularly for

Bank debt levels “outrageous”: Stanford professor

In 1840 equity funded more than 50 per cent of bank assets in the US, now it’s around 7 per cent. Banks would never lend to a business with no equity.