The future of work: Key ingredients for success

It was in 2020, a few months after the start of the Covid-19 crisis that Klaus Schwab, executive chair of the World Economic Forum, called for The Great Reset – a clarion call for the world to act ‘jointly and swiftly’ to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies.

Saying the tool to do this is stakeholder capitalism – and fundamental to this is a much-needed transition to a ‘fairer, more sustainable post-COVID world where companies have a responsibility, and a rare opportunity, to rethink organisational and workplace structures and to invest in their workforces’.

Over the last decade or so, conversations around the future of work have been largely linked to job automation. However, the pandemic has rapidly widened this conversation to also include where we work, how we work and the ways in which workplaces and the workforce is organised.

It has also had a big impact on employee-employer dynamics – effectively the give and the get – with more employees demanding improved flexibilities and employers struggling to catch up.

With productivity and organisational culture on the line, leadership engagement on the topic has mushroomed. The focus has often been on emblematic issues such as hybrid working, shortened work weeks and the redesign of workspaces to create more magnetic offices. However, there are some wider themes which we have observed through our work with investment organisations:

1. The hybrid work journey remains messy

It is clear that the future of work is hybrid. In a CFA Institute’s survey on the future of work, 81 per cent of investment professionals stated that they would like to spend more time working remotely, with employers having to rapidly adapt to meet this demand through more flexible working policies.

Sponsored Content

However, hybrid design needs strong execution, with value being currently derived through considering social interactions, space utilisation and time optimisation and future value being developed through the presence of networks, relationships, shared norms and trust. There is a real opportunity here to think about what hybrid working actually means, with better policies involving a degree of co-creation with employees and where work is adapted based on location, synchronicity and connectivity needs.

Part of the hybrid challenge isn’t just about getting employees into the office – it’s also about making the most of their time. Microsoft’s latest Work Trend Index notes that despite the fact that 44 per cent of hybrid employees and 43 per cent of remote attendees don’t feel included in meetings, just 27 per cent of organisations have established new hybrid meeting etiquette to ensure that everyone feels included and engaged. Leaders need to make the office worth the commute and employees now have different expectations as to what the office experience should deliver. Social capital and the value that it adds through collaboration, belonging, trust and goodwill should be seen alongside human, intellectual and financial capital in organisations as a key enabler of value creation. Innovation is also powered by social capital. So the challenge for leaders is to reconfigure their workspaces to prioritise social engagement and set aside time for in-person activities where interaction is facilitated.

2. While talent is everywhere it is unnecessarily scarce

We are in the midst of The Great Reshuffle – a term broadly used to describe the mass movement of workers seeking roles that better meet their work/life requirements and/or are better aligned with their values.

US academic, Anthony Klotz – who coined the forerunner term The Great Resignation – notes that individuals are now seeking opportunities that allow them ‘to fit work into their lives, instead of having lives that squeeze into their work’.

Talent is dispersed globally and there is an opportunity here for leaders to become more creative in using global talent and to think about how it can be used to create a more agile and distributed workforce. The shift to a more networked structure requires moving from traditional approaches where employees are boxed into projects based on their current job role to a more holistic, flexible approach which matches employees’ varied skillsets to relevant projects. This requires the collection of more data on employee experiences, a better understanding of a workforce’s skills and embracing technological innovations that allow teams to work in more global and continuous real-time ways.

With in-person time being reduced, we also find that the T-shaped qualities of people and teams becomes more valuable in the new world of work. T-shaped individuals and teams seek to connect dots better through building inner ties and developing outer networks. There is a real opportunity here for leadership to transform existing teams into superteams – by combining diverse and talented individuals within a strong culture and having excellent governance – to deliver exceptional outcomes.

3. The rise of the human-centric organisation

The COVID-19 crisis has been a defining leadership and transformation moment, where leaders have been called to reset their future of work agendas and lead the way to better and more human-centric workplaces and workforces.

We are now in the era of human-focused company culture where workers are re-evaluating what matters most to them. This has prompted employers to focus on the wellbeing and personal satisfaction of employees though increasingly flexible work arrangements, investing in wellness programs and boosting diversity, equity and inclusion efforts.

LinkedIn’s 2022 Global Talent Trends survey notes a 147 per cent increase in the share of job posts that mentioned wellbeing since 2019 and a 73 per cent increase in companies’ posts about wellbeing. According to the survey, employees that feel cared for at work are 3.2x more likely to be happy at work and 3.7x more likely to recommend others to work for the company. The same survey notes that work-life balance trumps even bank balance for job seekers.

Productivity is multi-faceted. Work has long shifted from simply a function of time, activity and effectiveness and viewed solely through the lens of the value delivered to the organisation. Instead, the employee value proposition has become more central and includes work flexibility, work/life integration, personal growth, employee experience and wellbeing. There is an increasing appetite for a new leadership model to deal with these challenges that is less hierarchical, more networked, more versatile and is driven by more soft power. This new model needs to encourage empowerment, joined-upness and humanism with positive stakeholder outcomes at its core and which champions connections and collaboration while focusing on behaviours.

It’s a juggling act.

Successful work design in this new world will require finding a fairer balance between employee and organisation, where employees crave flexibility and meaning and employers require productivity, impact and a culture that aligns with its purpose.

A key ingredient of success will be an emphasis on how work is done. This is the sweet spot where organisation and employee can meet around belonging and teamwork at the same time as values and expected behaviours. Finding this balance will require some juggling and enlightened leaders will need to think deeply about these wider themes.

Marisa Hall is the co-head of the Thinking Ahead Group, an independent research team at Willis Towers Watson and executive to the Thinking Ahead Institute.

Leave a Comment

The Austin advantage: Texas Teachers talks optimism, innovation and growth

The Austin advantage: Texas Teachers talks optimism, innovation and growth

Jase Auby, TRS's celebrated CIO, explains why TPA doesn't fit with its culture; why community push back on data centres could turn out to be an investor advantage, and argues the case for continuing to invest in fossil fuels. Top1000funds.com sat down with the CIO in his Austin office for an all-encompassing conversation.

Sort content by

Equities allocation damaging biodiversity: Ilmarinen study

A recent biodiversity risk analysis at Ilmarinen, Finland’s €60 billion pension insurer, found one third of the companies in its listed equities portfolio have a damaging impact on biodiversity. The study is part of a push to integrate biodiversity into its investment processes.

IMF flashes dangers ahead

The worst is yet to come, warns the IMF in its sobering World Economic Outlook report. Investors will increasingly prioritise safe assets with implications for emerging markets while chaos in the UK gilts markets underscores the risks of a policy mistake.

Why AP4 invests with emerging hedge fund managers

In contrast to other investors, AP4 invests the vast majority of its hedge fund allocation with emerging managers in a strategy it believes taps both outperformance and lower fees. We look at how it spots talent and what strategies it focuses on.

CPP Investments: A pathway agnostic approach to net zero

In a fireside chat at Conexus Financial’s Sustainability in Practice forum, CPP Investments' managing director Derek Walker discussed incorporating climate risk into a total portfolio approach, and making a “pathway agnostic” commitment to net zero carbon emissions.

Maryland’s Andrew Palmer on why policy risk is his number one concern

Andrew Palmer, CIO of Maryland State Retirement and Pension System, explains why he puts a policy mistake and the Fed raising interest rates too high at the top of his list of concerns and what it means for how he allocates assets.

ESG data will always be imperfect, despite its critical role

Professor Roberto Rigobon and Mass PRIM's Michael Trotsky explore the complexities of accurate data in ESG investment. Abandoning ESG due to imperfect data would be like abandoning the judicial system for the same reason, argues Rigobon the author of the controversial ‘Aggregate Confusion’ paper.

Previous