How Ireland’s ISIF is helping crowd-in transition finance

The €15 billion ($16.1 billion) Ireland Strategic Investment Fund (ISIF) is finding compelling investment opportunities in the energy transition and is successfully drawing in additional investment to finance Ireland’s net zero commitments.

By targeting “climate positive” investments which support Ireland’s transition (outlined in the government’s Climate Action Plan) as a key investment theme, the fund is investing in both sustainable infrastructure and new technologies, and in business models to support the long-term transition. In 2021 ISIF committed €1 billion in climate projects over a five-year period of which it has already invested over €600 million.

The strategy runs in parallel with a divestment programme dating from 2018 when Ireland became one of the first countries in the world to sell out of fossil fuel companies. It  currently has a list of some 200 companies in which it won’t invest as part of that strategy.

When ISIF was established at the end of 2014 from the remnants of the National Pensions Reserve Fund, the sovereign development fund was tasked with attracting €1 million in co-investments across the portfolio for every €1 million invested. Today, typically around €1.6 million in co-investment is ploughed into projects for every €1 million the fund puts in itself, so that since inception ISIF has committed €6.5 billion across 188 investments that have unlocked some €10.2 billion of co-investment commitments.

“It’s positive for our investees and for the wider Irish economy,” says ISIF senior investment director Brian O’Connor, who leads the fund’s investments in indigenous businesses as one of four investment themes that sits alongside climate, housing, and food and agriculture set out in a 2022 framework that shapes the €8.7 billion discretionary portfolio.

The remaining assets (€6.3 billion) lie in directed portfolios held separately and under direction from the Ministry of Finance.  The discretionary portfolio targets returns in excess of the five-year rolling cost of government debt (2.8 per cent) over the long term, and assets are divided into equity (€3.4 billion), fixed income (€1.6 billion), real assets (€1.2 billion), absolute return (€1.4 billion) and cash and equivalent (€1.1 billion).

Sponsored Content

O’Connor says businesses and projects IDSF invests in must meet a double bottom-line, targeting both returns and supporting economic activity and employment in Ireland.

Scaling local businesses

O’Connor’s team oversees a portfolio of Irish businesses that spans investments in growth equity, private equity and private credit, managed by a range of Irish and international fund managers – the ISIF mandate to invest in the Irish economy allows scope to invest globally if there’s a benefit to support economic activity and employment in Ireland. The team also manages many of ISIF’s co-investments with fund partners and investments are roughly split 65:35 between fund and direct investment, respectively.

The ability to invest with global fund managers if it supports economic activity and employment in Ireland is vital in the fund’s ability to diversify outside Ireland’s small market. “Finding enough opportunity in the Irish economy is a challenge,” O’Connor says.

The fund does its best to invest broadly across many sectors and applies a portfolio approach to achieve a level of diversification across the risk it’s taking and the sectors it’s exposed to as it seeks to get its risk-adjusted returns right.

Investing across the capital structure

Diversity also comes with ISIF’s ability to invest at any point of the capital structure where the team use different instruments to best suit the investee. The fund can be flexible where many other investors can’t be, and is able to offer an alternative to low-risk bank funding or to private equity hunting double-digit returns, often over a three-five-year time horizon. The flexible approach plays an important role supporting an ecosystem of firms at whatever stage they are in their growth journey.

“We can provide debt at one end of the risk spectrum and equity at the other – and anything in between, whether it’s mezzanine finance, hybrid debt/equity instruments, venture capital, growth capital or private equity,” O’ Connor says.

“We aim to ensure the right mix across the capital structure. When co-investing in businesses, ISIF equity gives firms an ability to prioritise longer-term growth knowing that ISIF is not necessarily optimising to a short or medium-term exit timeframe.”

ISIF’s role of catalyst and its ability to attract co-investment capital into the economy is another central pillar. ISIF considers every investment on its ability to promote “economic additionality”, namely, benefits to gross value added (the value producers add to the goods and services they buy), while avoiding “dead weight”, meaning the economic benefits created from an investment would have been achieved in any event; and “displacement”, where the investment would simply substitute existing economic activity.

For example, avoiding dead weight means ISIF won’t invest in sectors that are already served by private-sector investors or by lenders to such an extent that ISIF’s involvement won’t make a difference. Instead, it looks to target important gaps that other investors and lenders aren’t filling.

“We do not alter our investment strategy materially based on market cycles,” O”Connor says.

O’Connor concludes with a nod to how ISIF capital has led to a new generation of international Irish companies.

“Many Irish companies have expanded to international markets in recent years,” he says. “The key is to help these types of companies by continuing to back their ambitions to grow over the medium and longer term and support them with access to funding via the co-investment partnerships.”

 

 

Leave a Comment

Public equity manager challenges the case for private

Public equity manager challenges the case for private

Loomis Sayles’ Aziz Hamzaogullari has questioned whether asset allocators are giving private equity more credit than it is worth, saying the case for investing in PE rests on flawed return measurement, hidden risks and high fees and that public equities should be treated with the same “patience” that PE receives.

Sort content by

The bright and dark sides of PE

Analysis of institutional investor private equity allocations shows the differences in implementation styles and related costs are a key driver of a wide dispersion in private equity results. Researchers at CEM Benchmarking show that costs matter, a lot, in PE.

Coronavirus: market impacts

The coronavirus has triggered a market correction, bringing the S&P 500 off its all-time high. But as always an analysis of fundamentals, and the relationship between price and value, is essential for allocating capital. So could this be a time to buy?

Church of England’s transition index

Being passively invested shouldn’t mean being passive with regard to responsibilities says the Church of England Pension Board which has developed a new climate transition index with FTSE Russell, LSE and TPI that is the first to incorporate forward-looking climate data.

Oregon PE revamp shakes off GFC legacy

Oregon Investment Council has committed to investing $3 billion a year in private equity, with the smooth pacing strategy part a response to the fund’s overweight position to poor performing vintages as a result of its allocations before and after the GFC. The investor is also focusing on manager relationships with a focus on accessing new relationships and upsizing the best existing ones; and a new strategy that sees no provider in charge of more than 5 per cent of the portfolio.

Recession likely in six months: index

There is a 70 per cent chance a recession will occur in the next six months according to a new index measuring the state of the economy that uses a statistical method first applied to analysing human skulls.

Scientific Beta critiques TEG benchmarks

Scientific Beta has critiqued the proposals of the TEG on climate benchmarks, arguing they are unduly influenced by commercial interests and do little to discourage greenwashing or support decarbonisation efforts in the real economy.

Previous