Canada to allow retail contribution to new SWF

Mark Carney

Canada has established its first national-level sovereign wealth fund with a seed of C$25 billion ($18.3 billion) to underwrite “nation-building” projects like ports, mines and energy infrastructure.

In an announcement on Monday, Prime Minister Mark Carney says the SWF, dubbed the Canada Strong Fund, will invest alongside domestic and international private investors to drive “economic transformation”. The announcement comes amidst a global push for sovereign wealth funds to involve themselves more deeply with nation-building activities, with Australia’s Future Fund recently having its mandate amended to require it to consider “national priorities” when making or managing investments.

The Canada Strong Fund will operate at arm’s length from the government as a Crown corporation – sharing the same status with CPP Investments – and be led by a chief executive and a “qualified independent” board of directors. The organisation will be overseen by the Minister of Finance and National Revenue.

The initial seed will be released by the government over the next three years, with the expectation that returns on investments will give the fund a boost in AUM over time. But there will also be a retail investment product which will allow “individual Canadian investors to participate in Canada’s growth and benefit from its financial returns”.

The latter is an unusual funding mechanism as sovereign wealth funds typically manage pools of state capital, derived from natural resources or foreign exchange reserves. Some SWFs also issue bonds to diversify their funding sources, such as Abu Dhabi’s ADQ and Malaysia’s Khazanah Nasional Berhad.

The government also flagged the possibility it would explore more diversified funding sources in the future. Canadian advocacy and research group Common Wealth suggested this could be from common assets such as natural resources rent, use-fees on public property and public-private partnership equity; value created in the economic system such as budget surpluses; or “market concentration fees” such as levies on anti-competitive practices.

Sponsored Content

A “Canada Strong Fund transition office” will also be established to engage with other market participants and regulators.

“Through the Canada Strong Fund, all Canadians will have the opportunity to share directly in these benefits. This is our country, this is your future, and we are building it together,” Carney said.

 Details are scant on how the pool of capital will be invested, and it is still unclear as to whether the fund will house an internal investment team or leverage external managers, what type of assets it will invest in and what its return targets will be. Details around mandate, governance and implementation plans will be bedded down in the coming months.

Canada is the latest in a slew of countries that have established SWFs or kicked off the process to do so in recent years. US President Donald Trump signed an executive order to establish a US SWF last February, though its specific shape remains unclear as the 90-day deadline to release a plan for the SWF came and went without further news.

President Donald Trump has loosely described the objective of the US SWF in the executive order as being for the “sole benefit of American citizens”. Stanford expert Ashby Monk believes that to mean it is likely to be a sovereign development fund – a type of SWF “that strategically pursues both commercial returns and specific domestic policy goals”, the research paper says.

Indonesia established its second SWF Danantara last February “to manage and optimise government investments and assets from state-owned enterprises”.

The Canada Strong Fund joins other state investment vehicles including Canada Infrastructure Bank, Export Development Canada and the Canada Growth Fund to underpin investments in essential projects. “Comprehensive mandate reviews” will be conducted to ensure clarity of roles in the federal financing system.

Leave a Comment

The twin forces rewriting the rules of investing

The twin forces rewriting the rules of investing

Portfolios built for the old world will be severely tested as emerging forces rewrite the rules of investing. The Fiduciary Investors Symposium heard that geopolitical and macroeconomic upheaval, together with the disruption wrought by AI, should force asset owners to rethink the structure and composition of portfolios.

Sort content by

It’s a drag: why TPA is superior to SAA

A total portfolio approach overcomes the governance, benchmark and inertia drags inherent in strategic asset allocation, and can add returns of 50-100 basis points above SAA, according to global head of investment content at Willis Towers Watson, Roger Urwin.

The rise of the Sovereign Wealth Fund

In the past 20 years the number of SWFs has grown from 20 to more than 100 with their assets estimated to grow by $500 billion a year. So where do they invest and what impact are they having on the market? Sarah Rundell investigates.

The bright and dark sides of PE

Analysis of institutional investor private equity allocations shows the differences in implementation styles and related costs are a key driver of a wide dispersion in private equity results. Researchers at CEM Benchmarking show that costs matter, a lot, in PE.

Coronavirus: market impacts

The coronavirus has triggered a market correction, bringing the S&P 500 off its all-time high. But as always an analysis of fundamentals, and the relationship between price and value, is essential for allocating capital. So could this be a time to buy?

Church of England’s transition index

Being passively invested shouldn’t mean being passive with regard to responsibilities says the Church of England Pension Board which has developed a new climate transition index with FTSE Russell, LSE and TPI that is the first to incorporate forward-looking climate data.

Oregon PE revamp shakes off GFC legacy

Oregon Investment Council has committed to investing $3 billion a year in private equity, with the smooth pacing strategy part a response to the fund’s overweight position to poor performing vintages as a result of its allocations before and after the GFC. The investor is also focusing on manager relationships with a focus on accessing new relationships and upsizing the best existing ones; and a new strategy that sees no provider in charge of more than 5 per cent of the portfolio.

Previous