Can America be great (again) ?

An erosion in social cohesion, lack of trust in institutions and lack of social mobility have weakened the fabric of society in the US; and it is these issues that are on trial as the country goes to the polls not who wins or loses, according to Stephen Kotkin, the John P Birkelund Professor in History and International Affairs at Princeton University.

Trust in institutions and governments is a key issue, he says. But not only are people not trusting institutions, they are not trusting each other. This is in part due to the concentration of influence and power among the elite and wealthy, and the lack of social economic mobility particularly among the poor.

“Unaccountable elites have led to rage, this is a deep and fundamental problem – how to make the system accountable again. How to make sure that policies work… for larger groups,” he says. “Giving the mass population a boost, the ability for them to be self reliant, to work hard and be rewarded for that, the way we all believe the system should work.”

Speaking to Amanda White in a Fiduciary Investors Series podcast, Kotkin – who is an expert in international affairs and diplomacy – says while the politics can be fake the sentiment is real.

“Democracy is challenged but not doomed. It requires renewal, that institutions and trust renewal and that fairness renewal. That’s within our grasp,” he says.

 

Sponsored Content

“Broadly the implications of the US election for the world, this is something deeply unfair, the consequences are felt in just about every country but they don’t have a say in the US elections. This is deeply frustrating and fully understandable.”

Kotkin says there is also a change in America’s relation to the external world, with both the Republican and Democratic parties now consisting of certain factions that are nativist, where previously the Republican Party in particular was run by internationalists.

“That means a return to the status quo where America is fully engaged across the world doesn’t look feasible in the short term,” he says. “I predict a continuation of this trend where there’s a lessening of international commitment. America will not and cannot disengage from the world but it won’t be at the height it was under Reagan or Clinton. There is a change in the balance of how dominant internationalism is domestically which effects the role of America everywhere, and this is a healthy debate.”

Kotkin also spoke of the US/China relationship, pointing to Taiwan as the weak point.

“I worry a lot about Taiwan as the place that could unsettle everything, the whole world, all of our lives and all of our portfolios,” he says. But he also points out it is not just Taiwan, but also Hong Kong and the South China Sea that are vulnerable points.

“China is the driver here. China deserves to be recognised but also needs deterrents for some of its excessive and aggressive behaviour.”

Stephen Kotkin will speak at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium digital December 8.

Leave a Comment

Why NYC pensions CIO hasn’t drunk the ‘TPA Kool-Aid’

Why NYC pensions CIO hasn’t drunk the ‘TPA Kool-Aid’

Three decades of investing have given Monte Tarbox sharp eyes for recognising risk and opportunities, and he’s putting it to use as the new permanent chief investment officer of the $306 billion NYC Bureau of Asset Management. In an interview with Top1000funds.com, Tarbox outlines his vision for the fund, why he’s bullish on infrastructure but “nervous” on PE, and why he hasn’t drunk the TPA “Kool-Aid”.

Sort content by

The China-plus-one ‘reality check’ investors need

While the dominant economic narrative has been that supply chains are shifting out of China amidst rising geopolitical competition and that the ASEAN countries are obvious beneficiaries, the truth is more nuanced.

‘Decay’ and renewal: Stephen Kotkin on the two sides of today’s geopolitics

While war weighs heavily on the world’s mind and its portfolio impacts are acutely felt by investors, celebrated geopolitical expert Stephen Kotkin said there is another thing that troubles him even more in today’s society: the "decay" of government performance.

AI will revolutionise investing, but machines won’t carry the can

Tokenisation of traditional assets will lead to a boom in on-chain trading, and that in turn opens the door to AI-agentic trading. But there are risks that AI agents may behave in unpredictable ways and, despite the hype surrounding the technology, still produce unexpected investment losses. In these cases, it will typically still be the CIO who bears responsibility – so they’d better understand what their AI agents are up to.

GIC: Geopolitical risks rewire asset allocation ‘operating system’

Some investors are “missing the point” of geopolitical risks by equating them to the disruptions from conflicts and wars, according to GIC chief economist Prakash Kannan, but in reality, geopolitical risk is no longer episodic or peripheral. This means investors need to think harder about inflation and country composition in their portfolio.

GIC, OPTrust on how TPA reshapes allocation process, accountability

Long-time practitioners of the total portfolio approach said one of its greatest advantages is that the investment team can make significant asset allocation at its discretion, as interest towards adopting the framework picks up among asset owners to handle more complex decision-making. At FIS Singapore, GIC and OPTrust unpack the governance and risk culture to enable it.

Why game theory falls short in AI-driven trading market

The rise of artificial intelligence-driven trading has raised questions about the possibility of algorithmic investors crowding into many of the same ideas and amplifying stress during times of volatility. Nanyang Technological University computer science professor Bo An explores the question at FIS Singapore.

Previous