Unilever chief calls for new capitalism

Paul Polman, chief executive of Unilever for the last decade, describes his day job as running the global consumer goods company. His full-time job is trying to create a different kind of global capitalism. In an inspirational speech to delegates at the PRI in Person in San Francisco, he announced the changes he said society needed from the corporate and investment world.

Polman listed four challenges that lie ahead. He said the world needed to decarbonise the global economy and move to a circular economy, and he told delegates the biggest global economies were using more resources than the world could produce.

“If we all lived like Americans, we would need three planet Earths,” he said.

He also said financial markets needed to move to long-term strategies.

“We can’t protect oceans in a rat race of quarterly reporting,” he said. And he added that the world needed to create an economic system that was more inclusive.

“[About] 87 per cent of the wealth goes to 1 per cent of world’s population,” he explained. “People are left behind and in any system where people are left behind, they will rebel.”

Sponsored Content

Normally, governments would steer countries towards meeting these challenges, but global governance is in disarray, rooted in post-World War 2 institutions. Businesses always adapt their models but our institutions are still based on 1944 structures, he said.

Polman told delegates they possessed the tools to deal with the challenges that lie ahead.

“We have never been so forewarned and forearmed,” he said. “The key element missing is willpower.”

He also said businesses couldn’t be bystanders in systems that give them life.

One of the most important tools to emerge in recent years is the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Drawn up in 2015, the 17 goals charting peace and prosperity by 2030 were signed into life by 197 countries.

“The SDGs are a perfect roadmap for how the world could run,” he said. Unilever is setting ambitious goals to meet the SDGs, which the company sees as a business opportunity.

Polman called on other chief executives to understand and integrate the SDGs, too. It was possible to take responsibility for value chains, become transparent, run factories at zero waste, stamp out child labour, ensure fair wages, end deforestation and work with governments to change governing frameworks that put a price on natural and social capital, he argued.

“There is nothing wrong with capitalism, but it shouldn’t be about a maximum return on financial capital,” he said. “We need maximum return on environmental and social capital.”

He noted important shifts in consumer behaviour that now account for the way companies act. “Companies are disappearing that aren’t adapting because consumers fall away,” he said. He also said employees now choose to work only with purpose-driven organisations.

“Millennials want to work for companies that have a purpose,” he explained.

A company’s worth is now tied up in intangible assets, which now account for 80 per cent of their value, he said. This demands a different strategy that understands new values such as employee satisfaction and reputation.

“The real value of companies now can’t be measured; look at how quickly companies that get it wrong lose market capitalisation,” he said. “Companies are getting caught with their pants down because they don’t understand they are there to serve society, not just their shareholders. They can’t load costs onto others and dodge responsibilities.”

He urged the investment community to challenge companies on their ESG record with tough questions, seeking out the companies able to give answers.

“If you see a murder being committed and don’t do anything about it, you are as guilty,” he said. “Generosity is better than greed, including in your investments.”

Society will solve its problems only if it becomes more focused on the long term, he argued. Nowhere is short-termism more prevalent than in corporate offices, where the average tenure of a public company CIO is five years. Polman urged investors to adopt long-term strategies over short-term thinking, to swap a focus on symptoms for one on causes, and to move boundaries so that behaviour changes. He said short-termism has created under-investment in companies and that economies were not growing because companies were not growing.

He urged asset owners to stop delegating responsibility for their investment to asset managers but to become actively involved in where they invest. Japan’s $1.4 trillion Government Pension Investment Fund’s proactive interaction with its asset managers on ESG showed how to do this, he said. The responsibility lies with asset owners to demand more from their managers, Polman said, and he criticised sleepy trustees and boards for not doing more. Boards don’t understand that fiduciary duty is to the long-term existence of the organisation or company and involves multiple stakeholders, he said. Incentive systems also needed to reward executives for long-term real performance, beyond financial performance.

Polman was encouraged by a new generation of chief executives coming through, particularly in the tech sector.[vc_subscription_cta s_cta_text=”Sign up to our weekly newsletter for regular news flashes and industry insights.” text_color=”#0c0c0c” bg_color=”” button_url=”/subscribe/” button_text=”Subscribe” btn_color=”” btn_bg_color=”#c0091f”]

Leave a Comment

What comes next for US-China relations

What comes next for US-China relations

Investors should expect more friction between Washington and Beijing over technology and Taiwan in the years ahead, according to Jake Sullivan, former national security advisor to Vice President Biden during the Obama administration. Meanwhile, the rise of middle powers is a geopolitical theme to watch.

Sort content by

Impact investment continues to evolve

Impact investment and its combination of financial returns and social or environmental purpose is beginning to move from fringe to the financial mainstream in part because the long-held concept that investment should only maximise shareholder value is beginning to fade.

SDG 16: How to invest in peace

Investment in the 17 SDGs is growing, but SDG 16, and its call to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, gets the least investor attention. Yet the idea that investors can mobilise their capital to nurture peace is wholly possible.

Biomedicine’s long and risky road

Startlingly few institutional investors have allocations to life sciences. An informal poll of 85 asset owners from 20 countries responsible for a combined $9 trillion assets under management gathered at the Fiduciary Investors’ Symposium at Harvard University, found only a tiny handful active in the sector. Yet allocating to biotech makes an important contribution to society - investing in the sector can help change lives.

CalPERS hunts for third pillar PE teams

CalPERS is conducting searches for outside partners to run its new Pillar III private equity program focused on venture capital investment in life sciences, technology and healthcare.

Disruption in demographic trends

Demographic trends will have a profound impact on pension funds’ investment returns, argued Patrick Zweifel, chief economist at Pictet Asset Management speaking at the Fiduciary Investors’ Symposium at Harvard University. He said ageing populations mean retirement ages need to rise and will see pension funds increase risk to stretch for returns.

The dangers of MMT: A counter argument

Look no further than the economic travails of Italy and Japan to see the perils of Modern Monetary Theory, MMT, said Sonal Desai, CIO, fixed income at Franklin Templeton. Speaking at the Fiduciary Investors’ Symposium at Harvard University, she countered the arguments of Stephanie Kelton, a leading MMT scholar at Stony Brook University and senior economic advisor to presidential candidate, Senator Bernie Sanders who espoused the virtues of MMT in a previous session MMT: A solution to broken policy?

Previous