PRI and the road ahead

The PRI will focus on a number of key areas in the years ahead including helping signatories invest in line with the SDGs and social issues, and pushing for more engagement.

Over the next five years, the PRI aims to drive real world outcomes in line with the SDGs. Speaking at Sustainability Digital, Fiona Reynolds, CEO of the UN-backed organisation, said the SDGs are the world’s business plan and have never been more important, adding that there is no need for a new plan – the world needs to implement and fund the one it has.

Estimating that the funding required to meet the SDGs from the private sector is between $5-7 trillion a year, she urged delegates to think about how they could shape outcomes. She also pointed to the PRI’s ongoing work on fiduciary duty regarding sustainability: if investors are going to implement sustainability, she said the law needs to catch up.

Elsewhere, she outlined the PRI’s ambition to improve data on sustainability. Calling the lack of data “a roadblock,” she said the PRI will work harder to help plug the gap.

The PRI also aims to elevate social issues, said Reynolds. Over the years social issues have taken a “back seat” compared to governance and climate issues. She said many institutional investors are both unaware and unclear as to how to work with investee companies to improve their record on social issues and human rights. With the COVID-19 crisis providing momentum, the PRI is launching a new five-year program on human rights that will push these issues centre stage.

Reynolds said she also wanted to introduce a new era of stewardship that moves beyond box ticking to focus on the most pressing systemic issues facing the world. Investors can’t engage on everything. It means the need for a clear agenda is all the more compelling, ensuring investors effectively use their leverage. She added that the PRI will also focus engagement on net zero commitments.

Sponsored Content

“This is the future of engagement,” she said.

Regarding net zero, she also urged investors themseleves to commit to net zero by 2050 across their entire portfolios. Shorter term targets should mark the route, she said.

Reynolds said that the PRI was going to increase accountability amongst its signatories. From next January, signatories will be asked to report on outcomes and the PRI will also increase the minimum standards needed to join the organisation. She noted that although the PRI is a “big tent” organisation that doesn’t want to set the bar too high for new signatories, it had to be made “harder.”

Reynolds explained that the PRI’s new focus comes in the wake of rapid take up in ESG in recent years. The PRI launched in 2006 with 50 asset owners and the aim to bring sustainability to the capital markets. After slow progress, in the last three to five years ESG has gone mainstream and responsible investment activities have matured, she said.

Although there is much more to be to be done, she said the PRI is beginning to widen its focus to investors’ role in driving real world outcomes that impact the world we live in. She noted that this required a different way of approaching and implementing responsible investment which, in one silver lining, has received a boost from COVID-19.

“The world has finally woken up to the importance of sustainability and the interconnectedness of the world we live in,” she said.

To hear more of the PRI’s plan for the next five years listen to Fiona Reynolds speak to Amanda White in the podcast, Sustainability in a time of crisis.

For all the conference sessions, stories and white papers visit the Sustainability content hub here.

Leave a Comment

China ESG risk: the next unknown

China ESG risk: the next unknown

One of the most important, upcoming challenges at CalSTRS is how the fund should evaluate Chinese investments from a human capital and environmental standpoint, says Chris Ailman, chief investment officer at the giant pension fund.

Sort content by

Investors debate engagement priorities

Should investors collectively prioritise engagement issues, and if so what is at the top of the list? This was one of the topics delegates discussed at the 8th Sustainable Finance Forum run by the Oxford University Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment together with The Rothschild Foundation and the KR Foundation.

Sensitive intervention points

Sensitive intervention points in the post-carbon transition. We must exploit socioeconomic tipping points and amplifiers

The big book of SI

It is with great pleasure that we present to you our Big Book of SI. We firmly believe in sustainability investing, and think all the stars are aligned for this investment discipline.

Principles to guide investment

Investors will play a major role, whether active or passive, in climate change mitigation. To enable prudent decision-making, we propose three physically based engagement principles that could be used to assess whether an investment is consistent with a long-term climate goal.

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous