Investment strategy on climate change

This first report by the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) responds to the recommendations of the Taskforce on Climate-Related Financial Disclosure (TCFD). CalPERS has been an active supporter of the TCFD’s work from the outset.

At the time this report is being published, the world is facing a global humanitarian tragedy and severe economic uncertainty as governments, business, finance and civil society respond to COVID 19. The pandemic has demonstrated with brutal clarity that tackling a systemic risk requires international cooperation between the public and private sector, driven by innovation at pace and scale. The lessons are evident: we need vision, partnership, and a relentless pursuit of scientific evidence to drive decision-making.

CalPERS’ motivation to address climate change is to ensure that we can provide benefits in retirement, disability and illness for our nearly 2 million members, people who come from all walks of life. CalPERS makes annual benefit payments of approximately $25 billion. For every dollar paid out, 58 cents come from investment returns. With a pre-crisis funding ratio of just over 70% and a target rate of return of 7%, we must seize the opportunities and control for the risks climate change presents to our portfolio.

Scientific evidence demonstrates that reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is critical to slowing global warming and driving sustainable economic growth. Physical impacts pose short and long-term risks to our members’ assets. These risks include rising sea levels, floods, severe storms, drought, and wildfires. Dramatic changes to the global energy economy, particularly as the world recovers from COVID-19, also pose transition risk as companies are challenged to adopt new strategies, without leaving their investors holding stranded assets, or in extreme cases, bankruptcy. In addition, companies are increasingly vulnerable to litigation. Climate change is a global challenge and one we cannot afford to ignore as long term investors, with inviolable fiduciary duty to our members. The consequences of inaction will be measured not just in the impact on workers and communities, but also on the companies we rely upon to generate the investments that pay benefits. The United States government’s own fourth National Climate Assessment notes the impending financial impact:

“The impacts of climate change beyond our borders are expected to increasingly affect our trade and economy, including import and export prices and US businesses with overseas operations and supply chains.”

Click here to read the full report

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

China ESG risk: the next unknown

China ESG risk: the next unknown

One of the most important, upcoming challenges at CalSTRS is how the fund should evaluate Chinese investments from a human capital and environmental standpoint, says Chris Ailman, chief investment officer at the giant pension fund.

Sort content by

Investors debate engagement priorities

Should investors collectively prioritise engagement issues, and if so what is at the top of the list? This was one of the topics delegates discussed at the 8th Sustainable Finance Forum run by the Oxford University Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment together with The Rothschild Foundation and the KR Foundation.

Sensitive intervention points

Sensitive intervention points in the post-carbon transition. We must exploit socioeconomic tipping points and amplifiers

The big book of SI

It is with great pleasure that we present to you our Big Book of SI. We firmly believe in sustainability investing, and think all the stars are aligned for this investment discipline.

Principles to guide investment

Investors will play a major role, whether active or passive, in climate change mitigation. To enable prudent decision-making, we propose three physically based engagement principles that could be used to assess whether an investment is consistent with a long-term climate goal.

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous