Decarbonisation linked to better returns

Cracked Ground From The Indian Subcontinent

As concerns about climate change reach fever pitch, Harvard Business School has published a report that shows investment strategies that “aggressively” reduce carbon emissions can significantly boost fund performance.

The university paper, Decarbonization factors, found that returns from investing in so-called decarbonisation factors went hand-in-hand with institutional flows. In other words, buying one one or more of the factors when flows are positive and selling when flows turn negative led to “significantly superior returns.”

There is a “significant contemporaneous positive relationship between decarbonisation flows and decarbonisation returns,” the authors of the report, which include business professor George Serafiem and Alex Cheema-Fox of State Street Associates, wrote. “This suggests that demand for stocks with low carbon intensity has pricing effects. This could be because flows of institutional money carry information about changes in the anticipated fundamentals.”

A record amount of money is already pouring into sustainable investments amid fears about the speed of climate change. Harvard pointed to a mountain of evidence that showed that the rise in carbon emissions to the highest levels in over 800,000 years was a direct result of human economic activity. Citing analysis from Moody’s, it said that if warming gets to 2 degrees Celsius, the economic fallout would reach $69 trillion by 2100.

Last year more than $31 trillion was allocated to sustainable assets across developed markets, according to the Global Sustainable Investment Alliance. Of that, Australian and New Zealand investors accounted for 63 per cent.

The paper also found that investment returns from decarbonisation factors were much stronger in Europe than in the US. This was partly due to a stronger response by European governments to climate change and a pricing system for carbon emissions which incentivised businesses in Europe to reduce emissions.

Sponsored Content

“Buying the factor when flows are positive, while selling the factor when flows are negative, yields even larger and more significant alphas between 1.48 and 4.43 per cent in the US and 2.50 and 8.51 per cent in Europe,” Harvard said.

“Our paper contributes to a growing literature on how climate change impacts investor expectations, capital allocations and thereby pricing and returns,” the report concluded. “Our results provide actionable insights into how to decarbonise portfolios and what are the likely performance and carbon exposure differences across strategies.”

Leave a Comment

China ESG risk: the next unknown

China ESG risk: the next unknown

One of the most important, upcoming challenges at CalSTRS is how the fund should evaluate Chinese investments from a human capital and environmental standpoint, says Chris Ailman, chief investment officer at the giant pension fund.

Sort content by

Investors debate engagement priorities

Should investors collectively prioritise engagement issues, and if so what is at the top of the list? This was one of the topics delegates discussed at the 8th Sustainable Finance Forum run by the Oxford University Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment together with The Rothschild Foundation and the KR Foundation.

Sensitive intervention points

Sensitive intervention points in the post-carbon transition. We must exploit socioeconomic tipping points and amplifiers

The big book of SI

It is with great pleasure that we present to you our Big Book of SI. We firmly believe in sustainability investing, and think all the stars are aligned for this investment discipline.

Principles to guide investment

Investors will play a major role, whether active or passive, in climate change mitigation. To enable prudent decision-making, we propose three physically based engagement principles that could be used to assess whether an investment is consistent with a long-term climate goal.

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous