Material climate change already here

The impact of climate change is already material, said Woodwell Climate Research Center’s Philip Duffy who warns that thawing permafrost could mean the loss of control of ever being able to manage climate change. Elsewhere, he urged investors to use their voice to bring about change.

The impact of climate change is already material said Dr Philip Duffy, president and executive director of Woodwell Climate Research Center.

Speaking at ‘Sustainability Digital: A Planet in Trouble,” he said that increasing wildfires, hurricanes and rising sea levels are all signs of change with profound economic and social consequences.

Last year’s extreme hot and dry weather in California is a continuation of a trend feeding into wildfires, while storms in the north Atlantic and rising tides and flooding are also part of a long-term trend. In Australia, trends in wildfires will evolve, threatening the east of the country, the most populated area with the highest vegetation. In the Mediterranean additional months of drought every year will lead to water scarcity, fire risk and have an impact on human migration. Duffy also warned of the impact of rising temperatures on crop failures.

Unstoppable momentum

Melting permafrost will also have a “major impact on life on earth,” said Duffy, who works with governments – as well as some institutional investors including CalPERS and OTPP – to help inform policy decisions. Permafrost is thawing as the Arctic warms, emitting carbon dioxide and methane in a vicious circle whereby the more the frost thaws, so it speeds up the thaw.

Sponsored Content

“We risk losing control,” he said, explaining that even after humans stop emitting greenhouse gases the warming will continue.

“We don’t know the probability of this, but it is a risk, and a risk we haven’t got to grips with yet.”

Meanwhile, he said a key consequence of climate change is that parts of the world will become difficult to inhabit with implications for migration.

“The potential for large scale migration and political uncertainty concerns me,” he said.

In a sobering message to delegates comprising over 300 global investors with a combined AUM of $12.7 trillion, Duffy explained that when we stop emitting greenhouse gasses, the impacts of climate change won’t reverse – they will just stop getting worse.

However, he stressed the importance of action now, and observed from his vantage of years working on climate change that “people are finally getting it.”

He said there is “no such thing as it being too late” and said strong action now and into the future will push the negative consequences of climate change into the future, making a “liveable” future more likely.

Duffy outlined the challenges of climate capture technologies that remove carbon, explaining that the technology and energy use is expensive. It is easier to slow emissions via man management or natural methods like restoring carbon to agricultural soils and re-forestation.

“It won’t get all the way, but this is something we can do right now and it’s inexpensive,” he said, adding that there is growing interest in agricultural methods that restores carbon to soils.

Duffy’s work includes advising pension funds like CalPERS and Canada’s OTPP on how to evaluate assets through a lens that takes into account physical climate risk.

“When we started this, it was something quite new; it wasn’t something investors were used to thinking about when assessing where to allocate capital.”

Duffy also explained that some regions and countries could benefit in the short term from climate change. For example, Russia and Canada may find more land suitable for agriculture. However, he stressed that long-term “we all lose” because of the impact of migration and political instability.

He urged rich countries, that have contributed most to climate change, to do more to help poor countries which have contributed the least but stand to suffer most.

“Like with COVID, it is in the interests of rich countries to help poorer countries,” he said.

Emerging economies are potentially significant sources of emissions going forward and if they develop their economies using fossil fuels, it will exacerbate the problem.

“It is in our own interests to help them develop their economies with low carbon and help them cope with climate change.”

He concluded that change hinges on increasing wealth but via lower carbon solutions – rather than asking people “to make do with less” – and espoused investor power.

“The financial industry and business sector has a strong political voice if they decide to use it.”

Leave a Comment

Climate the No.1 priority for 2021

Climate the No.1 priority for 2021

Climate is by far the number one sustainability priority for investors in 2021 according to a poll of asset owners from more than 32 countries which came together for the Top1000funds.com online Sustainability event in March.

Sort content by

Engaging with Investors on ESG Issues

Bond issuers—including sovereigns, who represent 50 percent of the fixed income asset class—are faced with increasing scrutiny on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues from investors. Forums organized by the World Bank Treasury to promote dialogue between institutional investors and sovereign bond issuers have highlighted the challenges sovereign issuers face in engaging with investors on ESG topics and in communicating ESG-related information that investors consider financially material to their portfolios. This document provides examples, best practices, and action plans that can help debt managers enhance their capacity to engage with investors incorporating ESG information in investment decisions.

Portfolio Engineering

For decades, we have engineered scalable portfolios to help institutional investors achieve their goals. In the past, these goals have typically been financial (eg. return and risk targets), but now many investors are also seeking to achieve environmental and social impacts through their portfolios. We believe the best way to achieve both financial investment goals and these impact goals is through portfolio engineering that incorporates these objectives holistically, beginning with crisply defining an investor's goals, systematically looking across a variety of asset classes to find assets that are aligned with these goals, and then combining those assets to create a portfolio that is designed to achieve a high ratio of return to risk.

New Policy Concensus

We are now at a turning point, with Democrats controlling both legislative chambers and the presidency, and an emerging concensus among Democratic policy makers and their advisors that enables fiscal spending that is both significant in size and ambitious in scope. Later this year, we expect to see the first expansionary fiscal package centered around the pursuing long-term social, environmental, and competitiveness policy goals (following the more immediate COVID recovery package). In these Observations, we explore two key shifts in Democrats' thinking underlying these policy proposals, which we expect will be sustained well beyond this fiscal package.

Social Conditions Consideration

The ultimate goal of economic policy is simple and timeless - to ensure prosperity and maximise living standards. Broad macroeconomic measures such as GDP growth, the unemployment rate, and inflation had for decades been a good proxy of rising prosperity, so they have dominated economic policy making and are enshrined in most central bank mandates. But even before the COVID-19 crisis, it had become clear that traditional economic measures have increasingly diverged from social outcomes.

Secular Supply and Demand

Over the past two decades, China's secular rise dominated commodity markets, as its industrialization required a massive amount of raw materials to build up the country. As we consider the future, we see many reasons to be bullish on commodities tactically, but one of the most important secular factors will likely support industrial commodity demand for years to come: the shift in global economies away from fossil fuels and toward greener energy.

Diversity Impact Score

Throughout its history, the U.S. domestic Asset Management Industry, projected by PwC to grow to $71.2 trillion in assets under management by 20251, has exhibited an empirical lack of diversity with respect to gender and ethnicity within its ranks. Numerous studies have shown that Women and People of Color (“POC”) are underrepresented in the Industry, including a 2019 study commissioned by the Knight Foundation finding that Asset Management firms owned substantially or majority-owned by Women or POC managed only 1.3% of the Industry’s total assets under management.

Previous