Foundation puts diversity first

Abstract background of multi-colored cubes

Bert Feuss, senior vice president, investments at the $13.5 billion Silicon Valley Community Foundation, SVCF, explains why diversity is so important, the steps the impact investor has taken to address the institutionalised lack of diversity and the impact on performance.

Q: Why is it important for SVCF to seek diversity in the people who manage your investments?

A: First and foremost, it’s aligned with our values of inclusion and diversity. We started working on this eight years ago. We looked at the diversity of our staff, of our grantees, of our board and of our community. Then we looked at our investment portfolio and it was clearly lacking diversity. And at the same time, if you truly believe that diversification of an investment portfolio across different strategies, different geographies, different points of view and different ideas generates better returns and differentiated returns, then it naturally follows that you would want to diversify your investment managers.

Not only was diversity in line with our values but it was aligned with our fiduciary duty, so we began asking ourselves and our investment consultant, Colonial Consulting, what the barriers were to identifying talented minority and women-owned investment companies. SVCF relies on Colonial for manager research and selection, so we asked them to demonstrate to us that their process for finding managers was inclusive. They began reporting on:

1. How many managers they meet with each year and how many of those firms are women or minority owned
2. How many of those managers are recommended to their clients other than SVCF and
3. How many of those diverse managers are hired.

I would also like to point out that addressing an institutionalised lack of diversity requires intentionality. As we and Colonial delved into this work, it took a while to integrate these practices into our daily routines. For example, Colonial had to modify their databases to capture this information. When they told their staff what they wanted to do there was a lot of support, because their team was already very diverse. There was also some pushback since it was creating additional work. It was an adjustment on both their side and ours.

Sponsored Content

Then in 2015 they hired a dedicated head of manager equity, Angela Matheny. Because of her outreach, the number of meetings with diverse and women-owned firms shot up dramatically. In 2018 they met with over 515 managers, 202 of which were diverse, compared with 2016 when they met with only 50 diverse managers.

Q: Can you elaborate on why diversity is important to generate returns?

A: As I noted earlier, different experiences and backgrounds drive differentiated return streams. Often too, these newer, smaller managers are still building their businesses so they’re really focused on driving performance. They’re grateful for the opportunity and feel tremendous commitment to do well by their clients.

Q: How did diversity impact performance?

A: So far, Colonial has found that out of 19 managers deployed across their client base, all but four beat their benchmark. The four that didn’t had only missed the benchmark by less than 1 per cent. The ones at the top of the list wildly outperformed the benchmark, by hundreds of basis points. The results were promising. You need managers with different points of view and different life experiences who understand different parts of the world, understand different sectors, understand different geographies. Not just white males who attend Ivy Leagues schools and worked for a private wealth management firm in New York.

Q: What are other people in the investment business doing? Are other firms working to diversify the firms that manage their funds?

A: We definitely have seen a growing interest in this approach over the last few years. Other community foundations and private foundations with similar values have reached out to us. Consultants have also contacted us to understand how we approached this.

Q: What questions do these groups asks? What are their concerns?

A: They often want guidance on building consensus within their organisation to move the idea forward with their board and investment committee. Consultants have told me “Well, we’ve looked and we can’t find these managers,” which Colonial has disproved easily. There are also the concerns around performance, which demonstrates the inherent biases that people have.

Q: Why it is important that the ownership of the firm is diverse, as opposed to just focusing on the staff?

A: We look at the firm’s ownership, because that’s where the profits flow, that’s where the decisions are made. Then it’s also important that the teams themselves are diverse. When we meet with firms we’re always asking them about the diversity of their firm and how they share the returns that they’re earning? Are profits broadly shared across the teams? We want to see aligned incentives and that everyone is participating.

Q: Have you been able to find diverse managers across asset classes?

A: Yes, we have found diverse managers — or Colonial has on our behalf — across all asset classes. And if you look at how our assets are deployed across, say US equities, international equities, fixed income, hedge funds, private equity, it’s pretty well dispersed. Similarly, when you look across African American, Hispanic, Asian or multiple mix of those, and women, it’s pretty well spread out evenly across those groups.

Bert Feuss is senior vice president, investments, at the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, the largest community foundation in the world. According to its 2017 Annual Report, SVCF has $13.5 billion AUM.

Leave a Comment

Climate the No.1 priority for 2021

Climate the No.1 priority for 2021

Climate is by far the number one sustainability priority for investors in 2021 according to a poll of asset owners from more than 32 countries which came together for the Top1000funds.com online Sustainability event in March.

Sort content by

Behind OTPP’s net zero 2050 plan

Ontario Teachers' has launched its plan to reach net-zero portfolio emissions by 2050, the culmination of a decade of work by the fund in addressing climate change. Amanda White looks at the fund’s climate journey, which has significant lessons for other funds looking to move to net zero.

Engaging with Investors on ESG Issues

Bond issuers—including sovereigns, who represent 50 percent of the fixed income asset class—are faced with increasing scrutiny on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues from investors. Forums organized by the World Bank Treasury to promote dialogue between institutional investors and sovereign bond issuers have highlighted the challenges sovereign issuers face in engaging with investors on ESG topics and in communicating ESG-related information that investors consider financially material to their portfolios. This document provides examples, best practices, and action plans that can help debt managers enhance their capacity to engage with investors incorporating ESG information in investment decisions.

Portfolio Engineering

For decades, we have engineered scalable portfolios to help institutional investors achieve their goals. In the past, these goals have typically been financial (eg. return and risk targets), but now many investors are also seeking to achieve environmental and social impacts through their portfolios. We believe the best way to achieve both financial investment goals and these impact goals is through portfolio engineering that incorporates these objectives holistically, beginning with crisply defining an investor's goals, systematically looking across a variety of asset classes to find assets that are aligned with these goals, and then combining those assets to create a portfolio that is designed to achieve a high ratio of return to risk.

New Policy Concensus

We are now at a turning point, with Democrats controlling both legislative chambers and the presidency, and an emerging concensus among Democratic policy makers and their advisors that enables fiscal spending that is both significant in size and ambitious in scope. Later this year, we expect to see the first expansionary fiscal package centered around the pursuing long-term social, environmental, and competitiveness policy goals (following the more immediate COVID recovery package). In these Observations, we explore two key shifts in Democrats' thinking underlying these policy proposals, which we expect will be sustained well beyond this fiscal package.

Social Conditions Consideration

The ultimate goal of economic policy is simple and timeless - to ensure prosperity and maximise living standards. Broad macroeconomic measures such as GDP growth, the unemployment rate, and inflation had for decades been a good proxy of rising prosperity, so they have dominated economic policy making and are enshrined in most central bank mandates. But even before the COVID-19 crisis, it had become clear that traditional economic measures have increasingly diverged from social outcomes.

Secular Supply and Demand

Over the past two decades, China's secular rise dominated commodity markets, as its industrialization required a massive amount of raw materials to build up the country. As we consider the future, we see many reasons to be bullish on commodities tactically, but one of the most important secular factors will likely support industrial commodity demand for years to come: the shift in global economies away from fossil fuels and toward greener energy.

Previous