ESG is strategy at PE firm TPG

When private equity firms came under fire recently for the demise of Toys R Us and the harsh treatment of the company’s shop workers who lost their jobs without severance pay, it did little to suggest private equity investors were ESG-minded. Yet in an interview with Tanya Carmichael, managing director and head of global funds at Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, private equity firm TPG revealed it had been integrating ESG for years.

“ESG is a core value focused across the whole range of our business,” said TPG co-chief executive Jon Winkelried at the PRI in Person conference in San Francisco. “It affects how we think about the companies that we invest in, our due diligence process, the composition of our portfolio and how we want investors to think about us.”

TPG, a PRI signatory since 2013, has more than $84 billion in assets under management in buyout and growth strategies, along with a social impact fund named RISE. Winkelried believes ESG is now engrained at a cultural level, defining the firm as a GP.

The strategy is apparent in TPG’s daily work with its portfolio companies, Elizabeth Lowery, TPG’s managing director, sustainability and ESG told Carmichael. Lowery cited efforts to introduce initial cost reductions in portfolio companies around energy use or water waste as typical examples of ESG integration reducing risk and return value. It also focused just as much on the opportunities, building additional value like employee engagement or using renewable energy to save money, something TPG did with investee company Cirque du Soleil, Canada’s iconic entertainment group.

“We worked with Cirque on their touring shows on how to connect to the grid via renewables,” Lowery said. Another example was TPG’s work with portfolio clothing chain JCrew on sustainability in its cotton sourcing when it relaunched its brand.

TPG finds that its portfolio companies are open to integrating ESG.

Sponsored Content

“There is a perception that management teams are resistant about ESG,” Lowery said. “What we found is that ESG is already on their mind and not something to be avoided. We say it is part of how we build a sustainable business and that it is really important to integrate within the firm.”

Winkelried added that he found little resistance from chief executives of TPG’s portfolio companies.

“Companies partner with us in driving positive ESG outcomes. It comes back to the core of our identity,” he said.

In some cases, TPG can play a role in ESG education for limited partners that invest in its funds. It is also a journey that evolves, as more ESG issues such as diversity and inclusion emerge, Lowery said.

One of TPG’s flagship ESG innovations is its Rise Fund. With a $2 billion pool of capital, the fund invests and scales with companies, with real impact. Winkelried attributes part of the success of the fund to the fact TPG doesn’t run a segregated investment team for the Rise portfolio, rather it is managed through the main team.

Carmicheal noted encouraging signs of more convergence between mainstream private equity and ESG best practice.

“Some people are interested and others not,” she said. Continued dialogue and access to a good networking community to allow shared experiences and best practice are important. Carmichael also noted initiatives by the PRI and the Institutional Limited Partners Association to set up resources for investors to allow GPs to improve knowledge on ESG. Greater alignment around reporting would also help, Lowery noted, as would guidance in integrating new frameworks such as SDGs in private equity.

Leave a Comment

Impact investing’s case for scale

Impact investing’s case for scale

Impact investing has come a long way in the past two decades, going from a niche strategy to a $1.5 trillion industry, but there are still challenges for it to reach institutional scale due to the lack of products and insufficient evidence of outperformance in some parts of the market.

Sort content by

Why diversity is important: Calif. funds

CalPERS and CalSTRS recently hosted over 400 attendees from academia, business, and investment to explore the connection between diversity, human capital and performance. And gave participants tangible next steps on how to increase diversity within their workplace and fresh momentum to push the diversity cause.

Understanding US/China relations

Understanding the fractious relationship between US and China is more important– and simultaneously more confronting – than it has been in the past, according to Stephen Kotkin, professor of history and international affairs at Princeton University. While the China investment challenge has always been to capture the aspirational middleclass, the high-profile historian says “the big money that’s going to be made in China is going to be made from the dislocation”.

The future of engagement

Ben Caldecott from The Oxford Sustainable Finance Programme at the University of Oxford explains how emerging technologies, changing client preferences, new regulatory landscapes, and evolving economic geographies create new opportunities for more effective engagement and forms of active ownership.

Investors debate engagement priorities

Should investors collectively prioritise engagement issues, and if so what is at the top of the list? This was one of the topics delegates discussed at the 8th Sustainable Finance Forum run by the Oxford University Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment together with The Rothschild Foundation and the KR Foundation.

What can the past teach us?

Institutional investors' investment strategy should be serving the China middle class and the dislocation from within Asia, according to Stephen Kotkin,Professor of History and International Affairs at Princeton University speaking at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at Cambridge University. He explored what the geopolitical conflicts of the past can teach us about the future. He looked at some of the key points in history, how China, the European Union and the US have survived, and what it means for the future.

NY State Common’s climate plan

The New York State Common Decarbonization Advisory Panel, set up to advise the Comptroller, as trustee of the $209.1 billion New York State Common Retirement Fund, on how best to mitigate investment risks stemming from climate change and maximise opportunities from the new, low-carbon economy, has handed down its report this week. It has clear lessons for all asset owners.

Previous