ESG is strategy at PE firm TPG

When private equity firms came under fire recently for the demise of Toys R Us and the harsh treatment of the company’s shop workers who lost their jobs without severance pay, it did little to suggest private equity investors were ESG-minded. Yet in an interview with Tanya Carmichael, managing director and head of global funds at Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, private equity firm TPG revealed it had been integrating ESG for years.

“ESG is a core value focused across the whole range of our business,” said TPG co-chief executive Jon Winkelried at the PRI in Person conference in San Francisco. “It affects how we think about the companies that we invest in, our due diligence process, the composition of our portfolio and how we want investors to think about us.”

TPG, a PRI signatory since 2013, has more than $84 billion in assets under management in buyout and growth strategies, along with a social impact fund named RISE. Winkelried believes ESG is now engrained at a cultural level, defining the firm as a GP.

The strategy is apparent in TPG’s daily work with its portfolio companies, Elizabeth Lowery, TPG’s managing director, sustainability and ESG told Carmichael. Lowery cited efforts to introduce initial cost reductions in portfolio companies around energy use or water waste as typical examples of ESG integration reducing risk and return value. It also focused just as much on the opportunities, building additional value like employee engagement or using renewable energy to save money, something TPG did with investee company Cirque du Soleil, Canada’s iconic entertainment group.

“We worked with Cirque on their touring shows on how to connect to the grid via renewables,” Lowery said. Another example was TPG’s work with portfolio clothing chain JCrew on sustainability in its cotton sourcing when it relaunched its brand.

TPG finds that its portfolio companies are open to integrating ESG.

Sponsored Content

“There is a perception that management teams are resistant about ESG,” Lowery said. “What we found is that ESG is already on their mind and not something to be avoided. We say it is part of how we build a sustainable business and that it is really important to integrate within the firm.”

Winkelried added that he found little resistance from chief executives of TPG’s portfolio companies.

“Companies partner with us in driving positive ESG outcomes. It comes back to the core of our identity,” he said.

In some cases, TPG can play a role in ESG education for limited partners that invest in its funds. It is also a journey that evolves, as more ESG issues such as diversity and inclusion emerge, Lowery said.

One of TPG’s flagship ESG innovations is its Rise Fund. With a $2 billion pool of capital, the fund invests and scales with companies, with real impact. Winkelried attributes part of the success of the fund to the fact TPG doesn’t run a segregated investment team for the Rise portfolio, rather it is managed through the main team.

Carmicheal noted encouraging signs of more convergence between mainstream private equity and ESG best practice.

“Some people are interested and others not,” she said. Continued dialogue and access to a good networking community to allow shared experiences and best practice are important. Carmichael also noted initiatives by the PRI and the Institutional Limited Partners Association to set up resources for investors to allow GPs to improve knowledge on ESG. Greater alignment around reporting would also help, Lowery noted, as would guidance in integrating new frameworks such as SDGs in private equity.

Leave a Comment

The twin forces rewriting the rules of investing

The twin forces rewriting the rules of investing

Portfolios built for the old world will be severely tested as emerging forces rewrite the rules of investing. The Fiduciary Investors Symposium heard that geopolitical and macroeconomic upheaval, together with the disruption wrought by AI, should force asset owners to rethink the structure and composition of portfolios.

Sort content by

China tech rivalry is ‘existential’ for the US – and diversification

Decades of US economic and financial supremacy have made diversification away from it a drag on returns for many investors, but the forces that have underpinned that supremacy may now be coming to an end.

Rethinking portfolio construction at the human-AI nexus

As artificial intelligence models become more sophisticated, asset owners and managers are rethinking portfolio construction as an activity sitting at the nexus of human and machine, which means gaining an edge over the market increasingly needs investors to tap into the wisdom from both sources.

Investors boost inflation-hedging amid geopolitical conflicts; eye tactical shifts

Inflation hedging is back on top of the agenda for investors as conflict in the Middle East drives up energy prices globally, but the FIS Singapore heard that many portfolios are not well-prepared for the broad ways through which inflation can creep through. The new era of significant trade and capital flow shifts driven by modern mercantilism is also throwing out TAA opportunities.  

The China-plus-one ‘reality check’ investors need

While the dominant economic narrative has been that supply chains are shifting out of China amidst rising geopolitical competition and that the ASEAN countries are obvious beneficiaries, the truth is more nuanced.

‘Decay’ and renewal: Stephen Kotkin on the two sides of today’s geopolitics

While war weighs heavily on the world’s mind and its portfolio impacts are acutely felt by investors, celebrated geopolitical expert Stephen Kotkin said there is another thing that troubles him even more in today’s society: the "decay" of government performance.

AI will revolutionise investing, but machines won’t carry the can

Tokenisation of traditional assets will lead to a boom in on-chain trading, and that in turn opens the door to AI-agentic trading. But there are risks that AI agents may behave in unpredictable ways and, despite the hype surrounding the technology, still produce unexpected investment losses. In these cases, it will typically still be the CIO who bears responsibility – so they’d better understand what their AI agents are up to.