Debunking common myths about European distressed debt

 

Monday 21 May
9:00 – 11:30 am
The Codrington Room, Corinthia Hotel London
Whitehall Place, London SW1A 2BD
United Kingdom 

 

Over the next several years, it is estimated that European banks need to dispose of approximately €2.5 trillion of non-core assets. The €800 billion “firewall” against sovereign debt default in Europe and long-term refinancing operations (LTRO) have eased liquidity stress among the region’s banks, but has not dealt with their solvency issues.

Like US banks, European lenders bought plenty of lower quality, higher yielding debt between 2003 and 2008 to support leveraged buy-outs, real estate deals and structured financial products. They are now under significant pressure to sell these, and other, assets as a result of upcoming Basel III regulation, the need to reduce reliance on wholesale funding and requirements from the EU and local governments. For the first time, Europe is experiencing a distressed debt cycle of vast proportions.

This presents a compelling opportunity for investors. However some widely believed myths are preventing private capital from investing in European corporate distressed debt.

Banks are unwilling to sell assets at distressed prices due to weak balance sheets

Sponsored Content

The truth is that a number of European banks are selling distressed assets, but this is not necessarily visible because divestitures are generally less public for a number of reasons. The roundtable will discuss the reality behind this myth, what skills and experience are required to access these sales processes and the size of the actionable distressed debt opportunity.

European insolvency laws make it next to impossible to achieve debt-for-equity swaps

European insolvency laws are varied and complex. Knowledgeable investors carefully select the jurisdictions they work in and know what can and cannot be achieved. The roundtable will compare and contrast legislation in different countries to highlight the most attractive areas and how laws in more difficult countries are evolving.

Unions, laws and culture prevent effective operational restructurings of European companies

Restructurings in Europe are fundamentally different than in the US. European labour laws, unions and culture are important and powerful considerations. We will discuss how it is possible to work constructively with local officials and unions to develop realistic plans which can ensure a company’s long-term viability and maximize employees’ welfare over time while agreeing to appropriate short-term sacrifices.

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER YOUR INTEREST

Leave a Comment

Impact investing’s case for scale

Impact investing’s case for scale

Impact investing has come a long way in the past two decades, going from a niche strategy to a $1.5 trillion industry, but there are still challenges for it to reach institutional scale due to the lack of products and insufficient evidence of outperformance in some parts of the market.

Sort content by

Oxford Professor urges urgent European reform

The University of Oxford’s distinguished Professor of Economics David Vines predicted the ongoing crisis in Europe will turn into a “train wreck with implications for investors” unless governments undertake significant reforms. He urges for large write downs of the sovereign debt of southern European countries, a loosening of austerity in those countries and a significant

Fiduciary investor think tank London – delegate profile

Return to event coverage DELEGATES Jonathan Anayi, director, investment solutions, Winton Capital Ciarán Barr, investment director, RPMI Railpen Keith Carne, first bursar, Kings College, Cambridge Sarah Carter, executive director, Newton Centre for Endowment Asset Management, Cambridge University Nick Cavalla, chief investment officer, Cambridge University David Chambers, director of the Centre for Endowment Asset Management at

Concerns over private equity leave pension funds wary

Institutional investors are clearly attracted to private equity, but remain wary of the sector for its perceived lack of transparency and ability to be measured, high fees and a sense that they cannot invest into the sector as truly equal partners. “It’s clear that now is a time with a lot of flux in private

All aboard the change express as Railpen leaves the station

At the end of a corporate review process that lasted eight months, involved 23 meetings of a steering committee and produced 60 working papers, the UK railways pension fund Railpen was left with 422 action items. “We’ve done 224 of them,” Chris Hitchen, Railpen chief executive, told the Fiduciary Investors Symposium (FIS) at Harvard University.

Using a ‘foreign language shield’ to improve investment decision making

Introducing a “foreign language shield” into a decision-making process is a proven way of making better decisions, according to Cass Sunstein, the Robert Walmsey University Professor at Harvard Law School. Sunstein, a former administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), told the Fiduciary Investors Symposium (FIS) at Harvard University that

ESG factors take centre stage in the evolving world of the fiduciary

The modern responsibilities of the fiduciary investor extend beyond what are perceived as the “mainstream” investment issues to those related to environment, society and governance (ESG) factors. But there is a growing understanding among fiduciaries that ESG considerations are now equally important in discharging their obligations. David Wood, adjunct lecturer in public policy and director of the Initiative for Responsible

Previous