That’s what I’m talking about …

When a consortium of investors, which included the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, bought a majority stake in Skype from eBay in September 2009, it was valued at $2.75 billion. This week Microsoft agreed to buy Skype for $8.7 billion in cash.

While CPPIB has not issued an official statement, wary the deal hasn’t actually gone through yet, its $300 million investment will triple when it does.

CPPIB’s contribution to the $1.9 billion paid for a 65 per cent stake in Skype, investing alongside private equity technology-specialist Silver Lake, Andreessen Horowitz, a venture capital firm launched by the founders of Netscape, and Index Ventures, a global venture capital firm.

The deal demonstrates very clearly the power of liquidity, in droves. When eBay needed a buyer for the 65 per cent portion it wanted, or needed, to sell, these investors had the capital.

This was in an environment where investors were simply not allocating capital to private equity. According to research firm, Preqin, the end of 2009 marked the lowest period of fundraising in private equity for six years.

In 2009, due to liquidity constraints many investors were sellers of private equity, most notably some high-profile endowments, but for the likes of CPPIB which could buy at this time, the benefit is enormous, as this deal demonstrates.

Sponsored Content

It also reinforces the role and value of relationships. Goldman Sachs knows this only too well, providing financial advice to eBay on the 2009 sale, and now advising Skype (with JP Morgan) on the sale to Microsoft, in the process catapulting it to the top ranking of financial advisers on global technology deals.

For CPPIB, access to the deal was also partly afforded due to an existing relationship it had with Silver Lake, having invested $600 million in the Silver Lake Partners II and Silver Lake Partners III funds since 2004.

CPPIB makes investment decisions based on each decision’s individual merit (particularly their risk merit), and not a desire to fill a certain asset bucket. Any move away from the reference portfolio – which represents the low cost, low complexity investment strategy – to the real portfolio is an active decision away from that reference, with each investment “funded” from the reference portfolio.

At the moment, the total active risk is about 200 basis points – with real estate and public equity about 50 basis points each, and private assets about 100 basis points.

Conceptually the entire equities allocation of CPPIB could be in private equity. With deals like this, that seems compelling.

The other lesson from this turn of events, is the power of foresight. To some extent private equity investing is all about vision. And it’s vision that investors should be prepared to pay large fees for.

Some investors are better at looking into the future than others, or have the structures in place that allow for such investments. But all have in common the belief in the integral role that capital can play in “unlocking growth”. For CPPIB, triple the value in 18 months is some vision.

Maybe that’s why Mark Wiseman, senior vice-president of private investments at the time of the Skype purchase, is now chief investment officer of CPPIB.

Leave a Comment

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest, the largest workplace pension in the UK, says that private credit managers who prioritise institutional clients will be more favourably viewed. The £61 billion ($82 billion) fund has awarded a £450 million ($605 million) US direct lending mandate to Crescent Capital this month, citing the manager's institutional-client-first approach as a key attraction.

Sort content by

Concerns over private equity leave pension funds wary

Institutional investors are clearly attracted to private equity, but remain wary of the sector for its perceived lack of transparency and ability to be measured, high fees and a sense that they cannot invest into the sector as truly equal partners. “It’s clear that now is a time with a lot of flux in private

Costs cast increasing doubt over hedge fund relevance

The inability to scale hedge fund exposures and risks, has led many large investors, like CalPERS this week and ATP last year, to exit their hedge fund programs. Complexity continues to be a drain on the relevancy of hedge funds, but importantly cost is driving the agendas of these investors. As AQR’s Cliff Asness admits,

Why Sunsuper likes hedge funds

One of Australia’s largest superannuation funds, the $27 billion Sunsuper, is adamant that it gets value out of its large hedge fund program. This is against the grain in Australia, where many large funds (with the exception of the Future Fund) choosing not to invest in hedge funds. So why does Sunsuper favour hedge funds?

Japan’s GPIF allocates to smart beta

The $1.3 trillion Government Pension Investment Fund of Japan will use factor investing, or smart beta, as a third way of implementing equity mandates, alongside active and passive, following a six-month research project conducted by MSCI that investigated how to best implement the growing interest in factor exposures.   The research project conducted by MSCI

Capital provider: Australia’s Sunsuper

The $26 billion Australian super fund, Sunsuper, is investing in an increasing amount of exclusive unlisted asset deals. Chief investment officer David Hartley says the difficulties of banks in Europe in particular have led the fund down the path of increasing the amount of debt investments in its unlisted exposure. Much of this has been

What’s the impact of the stock:bond correlation?

The correlation between stocks and bonds in a rising interest rate environment can turn positive. So given the likelihood of a rate rise, what should asset allocation look like if investors are forward looking?   One of the growing trends in asset and risk allocations is to adopt a forward-looking view driven by macroeconomics, rather

Previous