How to predict your PE manager’s performance

There are an estimated 1,600 private equity firms around the world in capital-raising mode at the moment, offering fiduciary investors a smorgasbord of alternatives, split on regions, style, size, stage and sector categorisations. Some recent good news for investors is that, for private equity at least, there is now evidence of performance persistence.

Research from global alternatives advisor Preqin shows that the early returns from private equity funds, before they reach maturity, are actually fairly good predictors of final returns, contrary to popular opinion.

Fund managers typically launch a new offering as they come to the investment period for their previous PE fund, which will average about four years after the previous fund closed. With the previous fund being less than half-way through its life cycle, the question has been whether its early returns are much of a guide to manager skill.

After analysing 5,300 PE funds, including about 2,500 buyout and venture funds with sufficient maturity to be part of the research, Preqin compared the funds’ performance during their fourth year with their performance at maturity. They also performed the same analysis for funds in their sixth year and looked at the proportion of funds which change quartile form year to year. The results are interesting. The main points are:

•      early quartile rankings for both buyout and venture capital funds are an excellent predictor for future relative performance,

•      half of the buyout funds ranked in top quartile in year four go on to be top quartile at maturity, with 75 per cent beating the median, while 60 per cent of venture funds in top quartile at year four maintain top quartile position at maturity with 76 per cent beating the median,

Sponsored Content

•      poor relative performance early on in a fund’s life proves to be extremely difficult to turn around. Just over half (51 per cent) of buyout funds in the bottom quartile in year four remain there at maturity, while 60 per cent of venture funds in the bottom quartile at year four maintain this position at maturity.

•        By year six, quartile rankings are even more important. A total of 67 per cent of top quartile buyout funds in year six maintain this position at maturity, with only 11 per cent failing to beat the median. A total of 73 per cent of venture capital funds maintain their position in the top quartile, with only 5 per cent failing to beat the median. Conversely, only 11 per cent of bottom ranked buyout and 7 per cent of bottom ranked venture funds in year six are able to turn things around and beat the median at maturity.

Tim Friedman, Preqin senior manager and author of the report, says that the results of this work indicate that investors should pay attention to a fund manager’s quartile ranking for recently launched funds and those considering purchases on the secondaries market should be extremely wary of bottom-quartile funds.

However, not all funds perform to type. A significant minority – 12 per cent – of bottom-quartile buyout funds at year four are able to achieve top-quartile status at maturity.

Leave a Comment

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest, the largest workplace pension in the UK, says that private credit managers who prioritise institutional clients will be more favourably viewed. The £61 billion ($82 billion) fund has awarded a £450 million ($605 million) US direct lending mandate to Crescent Capital this month, citing the manager's institutional-client-first approach as a key attraction.

Sort content by

A more thoughtful private equity model

Responsible investors need to take into account how fund management and investment structures may be exacerbating wealth and income disparities, as well as systemic market risk. Raphaele Chappe and Delilah Rothenberg from the Predistribution Initiative have some suggestions for how PE could be adjusted in this regard and how building back better post-COVID-19 requires a more thoughtful model.

Has your value definition just expired?

Is book-to-price still a suitable definition of the value factor? Researchers at Scientific Beta explore the arguments for different definitions including how to account for intangible capital.

Braving the unknown: high yield debt

Option-adjusted spreads for US high yield are above 700 basis points, a stress event threshold only breached four other times in the last two decades.  Mercer's Nathan Struemph examines the considerations for investors looking at these investments including the range of return outcomes in prior stress events, the path investors had to experience in reaching those outcomes, and the impact of implementation timeliness on returns.

Dislocated credit market opportunities

Credit opportunities within long-only fixed income, hedge funds and private markets are broad and likely to expand as the economic impact of COVID-19 is reflected in corporate earnings and balance sheets. This type of environment has historically led to investment opportunities for long-term investors across the credit spectrum. Investors seeking to benefit from credit dislocation should ensure that suitable portfolio allocations are in place.

Real estate: The winners and losers

Real estate is one of the asset classes hardest hit by the pandemic. Although FIS 2020 experts warn that some companies may never return to the office, opportunities are already appearing in smaller, regional hubs while listed real estate will recover quicker than private investments.

New AA model prioritises liquidity

Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund GIC and PGIM, one of the world’s largest asset managers, have collaborated to develop a world-first asset allocation framework that explicitly models the impact of private assets on total portfolio liquidity, incorporating both the top-down allocation view and the bottom-up cash flow view.

Previous