Ohio STRS warns of higher US recession risk; prioritises liquidity

The State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio has warned of a “material” increase in US recession risk compared to last year as the fund braces for a wider, “negatively skewed” distribution of outcomes in the next 12 months.

The $108 billion fund, which oversees retirement assets for the state’s public educators, said that recession – while remaining outside of its base case – would be detrimental to its funded status, which sits at 81 per cent, if it was combined with negative portfolio returns.

It came as the fund culled policy allocations to domestic and international equities and is leaning into new fixed income and new asset classes including liquid alternatives, prioritising yield and liquidity. In private markets, the fund is also targeting billions of new commitments into private equity and private credit.

“The probability of a recession has increased, as energy-related inflation pressures combined with slowing growth limit the FOMC’s room to ease and could potentially require tightening,” Ohio STRS said in its investment plan for the new financial year published on its website. A survey of internal portfolio managers at the fund put the probability of a US recession over the next 12 months at an average of 23 per cent.

The Federal Reserve holding interest rates and US growth maintaining its long-term sustainable rate remain the base case for the fund. The stronger outcome would see improved inflation dynamics and resilience in household demand and business investments, while the weaker outcome would see persistent pressure from energy prices and weak labour market conditions.

The fund is of the view that overall economic risks in the next year are “tilted to the downside”.

Sponsored Content

“Under the base case, growth runs around trend – meaning near its long-term sustainable pace – supported by consumer demand and AI-driven investment, though the distribution of outcomes is unusually wide,” the fund said.

 “[Of the conflict in Iran], even under a negotiated outcome, normalisation of oil flows and global trade is expected to resume gradually over several months, with lasting structural impacts on shipping behaviour, insurance costs and risk premia.

“This environment reinforces downside risks to growth, supports a higher-for-longer inflation backdrop and contributes to increased dispersion across global markets.”

Prioritising liquidity

Despite the macroeconomic challenges, the risk with the highest probability and most financial impact for Ohio STRS would be not meeting its long-term actuarial rate of return, which is 6.42 per cent per annum over a decade.

The mature plan has stabilised its funded ratio to above 80 per cent since 2021, but 2025 was the first year in over a decade where that ratio decreased compared to the previous period. Liquidity risk is a prime consideration for an investor with approximately $4 billion of negative cash flow per annum.

The fund completed its most recent asset liability study in 2025 and a new asset allocation will be rolled out over a three-year period.

Changes include increasing the policy allocation for its liquidity Treasury portfolio (from 5 to 5.5 per cent) and creating a long Treasury portfolio (with a 3 per cent policy allocation) to provide the total fund with more duration and liquidity. In the new fiscal year the fund said it will continue to grow the two areas.

It will also expand the actual allocation to core plus fixed income to bring it closer to the long-term policy allocation of 21.5 per cent, with selective overweights in credit and securitised sectors. It’s currently overweight mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, investment grade corporates and high yield.

Liquid alternatives will also play a bigger role as a new standalone asset class with a long-term policy target of 7 per cent. It’s a budding area of allocation which only represents 1.8 per cent of the fund as of April 2026, as the fund seeks uncorrelated return sources from public equities.

Over half of the liquid alternatives portfolio is currently allocated to alternative risk premia strategies, and the rest roughly split equally between directional and opportunistic strategies.

Long-term policy allocations to stocks will be significantly culled to fund the more yield-driven and diversifying asset classes. The domestic equities’ policy target has been reduced from 26 per cent to 19.25 per cent, while international equities is reduced from 22 per cent to 15.75 per cent.

“We maintain overweight positions in large, high-quality companies, where cash flow generation and AI advantages are most prominent, while holding smaller companies at benchmark weight until sustained earnings improvement and definitive interest-rate relief indicate a stable recovery,” the fund said of US equities.

In international equities, the fund will manage the portfolio with a slight increase to emerging markets compared to developed markets (21/79 split) as opposed to the 20/80 neutral split in expectation of stronger emerging markets earnings growth.

Private asset classes including real estate, private equity and private credit will largely remain in line with the current allocation.

In property, the fund will rebalance towards residential and industrial property types and reduce office exposure. In private equity, it will target $1.1 – 1.5 billion in new commitments, focusing on buyout in middle market managers, scaling venture and growth exposures and expanding co-investments and direct investments. In private credit, it will target $1.4 – 2.2 billion in new commitments focusing on direct lending, specialty finance and direct investments.

Leave a Comment

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

As concerns in private credit mount, Colorado PERA CIO and COO Amy McGarrity says the pension fund isn’t seeing any strains in its growing allocation to the asset class, arguing that long-term investors are shielded from the risks because they can lock up their capital to weather market cycles.

Sort content by

Bridgewater’s Prince: Time to think differently in an MP3 world

Bridgewater’s co-CIO Bob Prince explains the perils of MP3 and suggests investors need to think differently, shaping strategies around cash-flow yields - connecting equity cash flows to stable sources of spending in the economy.

Biases: COVID-19 vaccines and investing in China

Liang Yin from the Thinking Ahead Institute examines omission bias as an explanation for vaccine resistance, and underweighting investments to China. He suggests a framework for overcoming this bias.

Future Fund sceptical on correlations

The Future Fund, Australia’s A$226 billion sovereign wealth fund, has embarked on an ambitious project instigated during the crisis which includes re-examining its investment assumptions, risk tolerance and the way it allocates capital. Amanda White talks to the fund’s new CIO, Sue Brake about where the fund will be allocating in the future including alternatives and active management.

NEST’s PE challenge to the industry

The UK defined contribution fund, NEST has added a number of new asset classes to its portfolio over the past year – including infrastructure with a focus on renewables – but the fund is still missing an allocation to private equity. CIO Mark Fawcett spoke to Amanda White about the fund’s challenge to the industry on private equity fees, its focus on climate-aware portfolios and innovative approaches to portfolio management.

CalPERS CEO on the ALM challenge

The CEO of CalPERS Marcie Frost has a big year ahead. Not only is the fund still searching for a CIO, but it will also conduct its four-yearly asset liability study this year. Frost speaks to Amanda White about the challenges of the top job at the largest fund in the US and how she works to make sure the “real story” of CalPERS gets told.

Debt concerns drive Ohio allocations

Farouki Majeed is worried about the future. His concerns are centred around the implications of the enormous US federal debt; the global competitiveness of the US and Chinese economies; inflation; and the potential erosion of the value of the US dollar.

Previous