Washington State prioritises excellence

The $70.5 billion Washington State Investment Board has prioritised hiring the best managers in public equities and is willing to sacrifice the number of active investment relationships in lieu of the managers it believes are “truly exceptional” as it enters 2010 with plans for global manager searches.

As part of its 2010 public equities strategy, the fund will focus on the less efficient global and emerging markets allotting broad mandates and migrate towards a broader, more flexible, more focused, global structure.

Chief investment officer, Gary Bruebaker, said the search for global managers would focus on finding the best managers, those with which the fund has “high conviction”.

The WSIB has a target allocation of 37 per cent to equities, split between international (22 per cent) and US equities (15 per cent) and hires a total of 13 managers.

Within international equities 20 per cent is allocated to emerging markets, where all of the assets are managed actively in five mandates, and 80 per cent to developed markets, split 80:20 to active managed by a total of nine managers.

In a presentation to the board senior investment officer, public equity, Philip Paroian, said passive management should be the default investment strategy in cases when staff cannot identify exceptional managers.

Sponsored Content

One of the board’s trustees, David Nierenberg who sits on the WSIB’s private markets and public markets committees and is president of Nierenberg Investment Management Company, stressed the importance of having adequate resources to find the best active managers and oversee those managers.

“If we do not have the resources to do this, then we must fall back to more indexing and selection and oversight of fewer active managers,” he said.

Bruebaker said the board has set clear direction that they are not interested in managing active US equities, and he said staff should not bring forth any active purely US focused products.

About 75 per cent of the US equities allocation is passive, with a 25 per cent enhanced indexed allocation.

The WSIB public equities managers are Capital, JP Morgan, Lazard, GMO, Arrowstreet, Pyramis, Artio, William Blair, LSV, Mondrian, Barclays, SSgA, and BGI.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous