US ivy league endowments cling to returns … just

Endowments are back, just. The annual survey of their returns by NACUBO-Commonfund showed an average return of 11.9 per cent for the 850 college and university endowments in the study for the year to June 2010.

But Yale, the envy of other endowments and most pension funds for many years, was near the bottom of the league table as it struggles to recover ground lost in 2008 and 2009. The average endowment lost 18.7 per cent in the year to June 2009. Yale had a below-average return of 8.9 per cent in the latest study, the lowest of the eight Ivy League institutions.

The focus is always on Yale because its famous chief investment officer, David Swensen, is largely credited with creating the alternatives investment model for institutional investors. Yale registered investment returns averaging 20 per cent a year between 2004 and 2007.

Most endowments have remained committed to alternatives throughout the global financial crisis, still averaging just over half in total asset allocation, and are underweight broad market US equities. The S&P 500 was one of the best performing asset classes during the study period – up 15.6 per cent.

Endowments have also tended to be overweight real estate which was negative 15.8 per cent during the period, based on index returns.

The Commonfund president and chief executive, Verne Sedlacek, estimated that most endowments were probably still about 25 per cent below where they were in 2007.

Sponsored Content

The study described the outperformance of smaller institutions versus the larger ones – the two biggest are Harvard and Yale – as “anomalous”.

John Walda, NACUBO president, said that over the longer term, larger institutions with their greater resources generally outperformed smaller ones and this trend started to return in 2010.

When the crisis started to unfold in 2007, many of the larger endowments were caught with illiquid funds because of their higher exposure to alternatives. They were forced to sell shares and bonds to cover the demands on their funds from the universities.

The endowments are perpetual funds, so short-term performance should not be a major concern, but they are used to attract students in the competitive US tertiary education system through their funding of research programs and university services.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous