Upgrade in sophistication for LDI strategies as demand rises

While liability-driven investing (LDI) has been gaining in popularity for several years among mainly defined benefit pension plans, the strategy and products are about to get an upgrade in sophistication, according to Russell Investments.

Russell, which has been a leading proponent of LDI in general and “target-date funds” in particular (which provide the strategy for non-institutional clients), says that LDI could become a foundation for the investment strategies of a majority of pension plans in the US within the next five years.

In its latest Russell Retirement Report – 2009, the firm says the extraordinary market events of the past few months will lead to an increased focus on LDI and also to changes in the way that LDI programs are built.

“The focus of programs will move beyond interest rate risk to incorporate other factors, including credit risk, yield curve risk and timing. In time, the nature of LDI will change again as risk transfer solutions become more widespread,” the report says.

Bob Collie, Russell director of investment strategy and author of the report, said that LDI programs had been primarily designed around managing interest rate risk, but last year it turned out that other risks mattered more.

Biggest of all was equity risk and counterparty risk worked its way up the list of concerns. Several risks that had been seen as second order and less pressing are now prime considerations for any LDI program, he said.

Sponsored Content

A copy of the report is available to pension fund executives who register at: www.russell.com/rr2009.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous