Tips for DC plan design

As more plan sponsors consider introducing defined contribution plans, Towers Watson encourages the deliberation of plan design, with the ideal scheme encouraging engagement, managing savings rates and investment elections as well as expenses and communication.

Towers Watson says to be successful a defined contribution plan must consider and manage participant engagement, savings rates, investment elections, employer contributions, distribution strategies, plan expense, and communication and education solutions.

Many plan sponsors fall short of their potential to deliver benefits despite apparent success in one of these areas, Towers Watson says.

To better understand what employers are doing to improve the success of DC plans during the past year, it surveyed 334 plan sponsors with combined assets of $386 billion, about 30 per cent of which had assets above $1 billion.

The survey found that many plan sponsors have attempted to better engage participants by designing DC plans that encourage participation, promote higher saving rates and educate employees about their investments.

It found that plan sponsors offering auto-enrolment have a much higher participation rate than those that don’t. Many plan sponsors that offer auto-enrolment also automatically escalate the contribution rate.

Sponsored Content

According to the survey, most plan sponsors are also offering a matching contribution which has been successful in improving participation because employees view it as an enticement.

But despite the positive impact of participation as a result of adopting certain plan design features, Towers Watson says further improvements are still needed if “DC plans are to fulfil their promise as an appropriate vehicle for retirement savings”.

“The practice of allowing plan design to shape and develop employees’ retirement plans has its limitations.

“This is because planning for retirement cannot be uniform for all employees, and employees are not always engaged. To ensure participants are on the road to success, plan sponsors must continue to provide information to help participants gauge how much they’ll need in order to meet their personal needs in retirement. Ensuring that participants have an arsenal of tools to effectively manage their retirement finances should be a near-term priority for employers.”

To access the full survey click here

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous