The Devil Wears UBS … revised edition

Style is not really the forté of the Swiss so it may come as no surprise that the London arm of Swiss investment bank UBS got itself into a pickle after it published a 44-page dress code for employees late last year.

The code, which included compulsory red ties for men and advice on acceptable stockings and lingerie for women, was widely ridiculed in the City.

Now, it seems, UBS has withdrawn the booklet and has stated it will produce a less formal slimmed-down version, according to news service Associated Press. A spokesman was quoted this week as saying: “We’re reviewing what’s important to us.”

This has allowed the notoriously aggressive London press the opportunity to revisit the original code. Some highlights are:

. For female employees, the code spells out how to apply make-up and what types of perfume are advisable. They need to avoid showing different-coloured roots if they dye their hair and also avoid wearing black nail polish.

. In the sensitive underwear department, skin-coloured is preferable to dark knickers.

Sponsored Content

. Men are told how to knot their red ties and advised to get a haircut at least monthly. They should avoid unruly beards and earrings.

. For both sexes: glasses “should always be kept clean – on the one hand this gives you optimal vision, and on the other hand dirty glasses create an appearance of negligence”.

The spokesperson admitted that people had made fun of UBS over the code but said it did not cause the firm any reputational damage.

One response to “The Devil Wears UBS … revised edition”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

US instos swing back to equities

The Conference Board’s 2010 Institutional Investment Report: Trends in Asset Allocation and Portfolio Composition measures the asset growth and portfolio composition of institutional investors operating in the US.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Blue-eared pigs challenge China’s leaders

Economists hate price and wages controls. They distort the natural forces of markets and usually result in pent-up demand and/or supply which will be unleashed at a later stage as well as a range of unexpected distortions. Investors, too, should hate them. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Russell Axioma launches factor-based indexes

Institutional investors’ increasing use of factor-based models to understand their portfolio risk exposures is the conduit for Russell Investments’ collaboration with Axioma to launch a series of factor-based indexes to rival MSCI/Barra, according to Rolf Agather, managing director of research and innovation at Russell. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Diversification is not enough for managing risk

Diversification alone is not enough to manage downside risk, rather academic research in dynamic portfolio theory suggests the three complementary techniques of diversification, hedging, and insurance can be used together to design customised investment solutions, that ultimately separate assets into performance seeking portfolios and liability hedging portfolios, according to EDHEC’s Felix Goltz and Stoyan Stoyanov.

CalPERS’ redesign creates CFO role

CalPERS will introduce a new leadership organisation design next year, which includes for the first time a dedicated chief financial officer function coordinating all corporate finance functions including cash flow. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Why politics and pension fund management don’t mix

Thomas P DiNapoli was given a little scare in the recent US mid-term elections but, in the end, was returned fairly comfortably to his position of New York State Comptroller and sole trustee of the New York State pension fund. What happens next, though, may be more interesting. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous