Tennessee plans asset allocation review

The Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System will conduct an asset allocation and portfolio implementation review, with an equities increase and reorganisation of the fixed income portfolio a likely outcome, as it investigates how to increase the returns of the fund at a strategic level.

The $29 billion fund is looking to increase its equity allocation as part of this review from 55 to 65 per cent of assets, up from its current position of around 50 per cent.

The fund is also looking at eliminating short-duration fixed income, adding non-investment grade fixed income and continuing to increase real estate.

The fund will also search for a general and private equity consultant.

TCRS returned 14.2 per cent for the year, which was an underperformance of 2.1 per cent against its allocation index.

Sponsored Content

Tactical asset allocation was the key drag and subtracted 4 per cent for 2009, with other negative contributing areas including domestic equities and international equities.

Domestic fixed income was the best performer for the fund, up 9 per cent for the year to the end of 2009.

At the March investment committee it was disclosed that the fund is looking to increase returns by a strategic increase of the equity mandate and modifying the domestic and international fixed income mandates.
Other plans include adding to private equity as an asset  class, by way of adding a distressed fund, a mezzanine fund, a small buyout fund, and another venture capital  fund.

The fund  also  has a goal  to  invest  up  to $1  billion  in  real estate over the next  five  years, and  is  also  exploring  the idea of launching a Canadian equity fund.

At the end of 2009 the fund had 2.7 per cent in short-term, 3.3 per cent in real estate, 7.9 per cent in inflation-hedged bonds,3.6 per cent in international fixed income, 33.4 per cent in US fixed income, 14.5 per cent in international equity, and 34.6 per cent in US equity.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous