SWF lions roar in Beijing

Sovereign wealth funds will consider the implications of capital flows and the build-up of foreign exchange assets in Beijing next week at the third annual SWF international forum.

Hosted by the China Investment Corporation, the forum runs for three days from Wednesday, May 11.

The forum will begin with a consideration of the use and application of the Santiago Principles, and then the forum will hear from the first of the IFSWF’s three sub-committees.

This first group is led by Azerbaijan, and consists of Botswana, Chile, China, Kuwait, Norway, and New Zealand.

The next session on risk and investment management will hear from the forum’s second sub-committee led by Kuwait, and consisting of Alaska, Alberta, China, Korea, and New Zealand.

The forum’s case studies will focus on:

Sponsored Content
  • accounting for “fat tails” in portfolio risk management
  • managing currency exposures of financial and non-financial assets, and
  • constructing portfolios for specific macroeconomic environments.

The global investment climate and recipient country relationships will be presented by the third sub-committee led by Australia, and consisting of Abu Dhabi, China, Mexico, Qatar, Russia, and Singapore.

Financial stability and the current state of the global macro economy is the first topic for the second day of the forum, followed by an examination of the impact of the global financial crisis on SWFs and other institutional investors, and its implications for long-term investment strategy.

Other sessions include regulatory reforms, investment regimes and the outlook for institutional investors from both the views of investors and recipients.

The final sessions focus on China:

  • its economy and capital markets
  • as a recipient country: opportunities and challenges, and
  • overseas investment: its role in fostering sustainable global development

The first SWF forum was in Kuwait in April 2009, and the second was in Sydney, Australia, in May last year.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous