Shareholder influence under question: ICGN conference

The ability to appoint and dismiss company board directors is the most important shareholder right according to an overwhelming majority of delegates at the International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN) annual conference, who were more cautious on whether shareholders could actually influence corporate governance once they had the right to vote.

Delegates at the conference, which was attended by more than 430 institutional investors and their service providers in Sydney, Australia this week, believe the prime purpose of shareholder rights is to ensure the accountability of boards.

Through interactive sessions at the conference, the delegates voted that the most effective way to incentivise the best boardroom behaviour was to have more diversity on the board, and more truly independent directors.

However while the conference talked a lot about the right to vote, only slightly more than half of the delegates had faith that once shareholders had the right to vote that they could sufficiently improve corporate governance in companies, according to an impromptu vote of delegates, by Anita Skipper head of corporate governance, Aviva Investors UK.

The key to improving corporate governance, according to delegate votes, was more active and engaged shareholders, while mandatory disclosue of share owners engagement policies, resources and actions was the key to getting share owners to act like owners.

The feedback also found that 78 per cent of delegates believe that mismanagement of conflicts of interest contributed to the global financial crisis.

Sponsored Content

Suggestions for improving the management of conflicts of interest including the disclosure of all significant conflicts to shareholders and how they have been dealt with, and exclusion of conflicted directors from all discussions and voting issues where they have conflict.

ICGN has members in 45 countries with a collective funds under management accounting for more than $10 trillion.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Washington reviews governance, pay and in-house investment

The pay levels, amount of in-house investment activity and governance structure of the $83 billion Washington State Investment Board (WSIB) may be under review following a rigorous debate that included a presentation to the board by KPA Advisory’s Keith Ambachtsheer.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

PRI calls for academics to fill ESG research gaps

Responsible investment research has reached a “tipping point” in its development, says the PRI’s director of strategic development, Rob Lake, and it needs to be more closely aligned to the practical needs of front-line investors.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Top1000funds.com brings some of the world’s largest investors together in Beijing

More than 70 investors representing more than $3.1 trillion in pension, endowment and sovereign fund capital will converge on Beijing on Sunday for the first Top1000funds Fiduciary Investors Symposium.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

HOOPP splits investment functions as Keohane appointed to top job

The $35.7 billion Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP) will split its chief investment officer function in two following the appointment of Jim Keohane to president and chief executive and the retirement of John Crocker.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

No rewards as systemic risk and turbulence ratings soar

The market is reflecting a high state of systemic risk and turbulence, and investors should adjust their allocation to growth assets accordingly, says Lucas Turton, chief investment strategist of Windham Capital Management.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Why institutions trade their reputations for profit

It is a key assumption that financial institutions such as auditing firms and credit ratings agencies will act in an ethical way to protect their reputation because it is, ultimately, the source of their profitability. But groundbreaking work by Harvard University postdoctoral fellow Abigail Brown posits that institutions may actually be incentivised to cyclically “trade

Previous