Shareholder influence under question: ICGN conference

The ability to appoint and dismiss company board directors is the most important shareholder right according to an overwhelming majority of delegates at the International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN) annual conference, who were more cautious on whether shareholders could actually influence corporate governance once they had the right to vote.

Delegates at the conference, which was attended by more than 430 institutional investors and their service providers in Sydney, Australia this week, believe the prime purpose of shareholder rights is to ensure the accountability of boards.

Through interactive sessions at the conference, the delegates voted that the most effective way to incentivise the best boardroom behaviour was to have more diversity on the board, and more truly independent directors.

However while the conference talked a lot about the right to vote, only slightly more than half of the delegates had faith that once shareholders had the right to vote that they could sufficiently improve corporate governance in companies, according to an impromptu vote of delegates, by Anita Skipper head of corporate governance, Aviva Investors UK.

The key to improving corporate governance, according to delegate votes, was more active and engaged shareholders, while mandatory disclosue of share owners engagement policies, resources and actions was the key to getting share owners to act like owners.

The feedback also found that 78 per cent of delegates believe that mismanagement of conflicts of interest contributed to the global financial crisis.

Sponsored Content

Suggestions for improving the management of conflicts of interest including the disclosure of all significant conflicts to shareholders and how they have been dealt with, and exclusion of conflicted directors from all discussions and voting issues where they have conflict.

ICGN has members in 45 countries with a collective funds under management accounting for more than $10 trillion.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Surprise on the upside for TRS’ strategic parternships

The trend towards the use of strategic partnerships by large US public pension funds is paying off, with the Teacher Retirement System of Texas claiming its program of a committed $4 billion produced returns of 7.3 per cent for the year to the end of September, well above expectation. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Cost saving on radar for Canada’s PSP as more assets come inhouse

The C$41 billion ($38 billion) Public Sector Pension Investment Board plans to bring more assets in house in a bid to lower costs, and will increase the number of direct investments to increase control, the chair Paul Cantor said at the annual public meeting. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS, CalSTRS collaborate to build board nomination list

CalPERS and CalSTRS have collaborated to build a network of more than 150 individuals from a diverse pool of sources to act as potential candidates for nomination to corporate boards, as CalPERS’ consultant advises it to synchronise proxy votes between internal and external portfolios. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS’ infrastructure consultant cuts fees

CalPERS has appointed a lead infrastructure consultant from its list of four shortlisted candidates that included Meketa Investment Group, Pension Consulting Alliance, RV Kuhns and Wilshire, with the appointed consultant offering a reduced fee structure as part of its contract. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Alaska fills special opportunities bucket with real return mandates

The Alaska Permanent Fund will appoint four real return managers in March next year to manage a total of $2 billion in mandates that will have very few restrictions, and has shortlisted five managers to fill the brief, as part of its special opportunities bucket that makes up 21 per cent of the total fund.

Performance attribution using a decision hierarchy approach

The increasingly dynamic nature of asset allocation and the combination of internal and external management within pension funds requires a performance evaluation model for deeper insight of the organisation’s results. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous