Roller-coaster ride for US corporate plan funding

While US corporate pension funds enjoyed their best month this year, in September, they remain chronically under-funded, according to the latest figures from Mercer Investment Consulting.

Largely thanks to an average return of 9 per cent from equity markets, the funding deficits of S&P 1500 company plan sponsors declined by a total of US$79 billion during September. However, they still stood at an aggregate of $428 billion at the end of the month.

In the past six months, the average corporate fund has been on a roller-coaster ride with its funding status and concerns remaining, with only three months to go before most plan sponsors have to do their next measurements.

Gordon Young, Mercer’s head of ‘integrated retirement financial management’ in the US, said that the aggregate funded status of US pension plans had moved 18 percentage points in the past six months – down from 84 per cent last December, to 71 per cent in August, and back up to 76 per cent last moth.

Following the good equity market rises enjoyed by most funds in September, there was continued concern about market volatility for the fourth quarter, he said.

Pension fund liabilities are valued using AA-rated bond yields, so the slightly higher yields translate into slightly lower plan liabilities, boosting the funds’ positions further.

Sponsored Content

Mercer points out that in an environment of increased funded status volatility, more importance needs to be placed on governance processes that allow investment committees to implement asset allocation changes effectively and efficiently.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous