Record losses for UK DB plans underscored by reliance on markets…

Five consecutive days leading into March were the most volatile on record for UK final salary pension schemes since accounting standards were changed in 2001, reflecting the risks associated with funding dependence on investment markets.

Aon Consulting, which measured the knock-on effect of volatile markets as measured by company accounts, found the combined deficits for the UK’s 200 largest defined benefit (DB) schemes between 26 February and 4 March, as calculated by the Aon200, were: £38 billion; £41 billion; £68 billion; £73 billion and £56 billion.

Marcus Hurd, head of corporate solutions at Aon Consulting in London, said volatile times such as these highlighted the need for every company to carefully balance its own risk appetite and cash management situation to find its optimal solution.

“Pension scheme deficits can only be funded by two sources – investment returns or contributions,” he said.

“Every company faces a difficult task in balancing the two approaches, because increased reliance on investment returns also often comes with increased risk.”

Hurd said company directors were facing a roulette wheel of pension scheme deficits.

Sponsored Content

“The levels of changes we are seeing are frightening even the hardiest finance director. A cool head and knowledge of all the options available are essential in these difficult times,” he said.

“We are seeing swings of unprecedented proportions at the current time. With one half of companies about to formally report their position at March 31, this is a real concern.”

However he said while pension scheme losses are obviously concerning, unless there is a risk the sponsoring employer goes into solvency it is worth remembering that pension schemes are long-term investors and have long periods of time to recover.

“It is only short term measurements, such as company accounts, that reflect the losses,” he said. “Sensible long-term financial planning and risk management should be high on the agenda.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous