Pension funds to sustain climate change pressure

Pension funds globally should maintain the pressure on governments to deliver on their promised emission reduction targets, in the wake of a “disappointing” result in Copenhagen, according to the executive director of the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change, Stephanie Pfeifer.

While the Copenhagen summit produced “good momentum” from countries which hadn’t made commitments before, such as Brazil and China, she said the lack of a legally binding agreement was disappointing.

In the first half of 2010 the IIGCC will focus on policy in order to push for a legally binding treaty before COP in Mexico at the end of the year.

“What we need to do is keep up the pressure and call on these countries to do what they said they would do,” she said.

Pfeifer said one hopeful aspect of the Copenhagen accord was the blank tables at the back of the document allowing each country to fill out their own targets. This needs to be completed before the end of January but it remains to be seen if this will be legally binding.

Sponsored Content

The IIGCC, which is a forum for collaboration on climate change for European investors, collaborated with other regional organisations in September to sign a policy statement calling for a strong and binding international treaty that will reduce pollution and catalyse massive global investments in low-carbon technologies. It was signed by 181 investors with collective assets of $13 trillion.

A recent study commissioned by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change showed the private sector would have to supply close to 90 per cent of the funds needed to meet the climate change challenge.

One of the key objectives of the group is to catalyse greater investment in a low carbon economy by bringing investors together to use their collective influence with companies, policymakers and investors.

It will continue to survey investors on how they incorporate climate change into their long-term investment strategies, and is collaborating with Mercer once again to survey pension funds in January.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous