Overcoming UNPRI implementation hurdles

With some government-committed funding, the Responsible Investment Academy, has the flexibility to achieve its aim of being the first global academic-training centre to teach pension funds and their service providers how to formally incorporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues in their investment assessments. Amanda White spoke to chair of the academy’s advisory council, Steve Gibbs.

About 180 global institutional investors, and more than 300 hundred of their service providers, agree with the United Nations Principles of Responsible Investment (UNPRI) enough to sign up to them. And yet, still most internal fund investment staff and funds management  analysts struggle with how to practically implement these principles into their analysis of investments.

Principles 1 and 4 go some way to instructing how to do this, with guidance such as “ask investment service providers to integrate ESG factors into evolving research and analysis” or “revisit relationships with service providers that fail to meet ESG expectations”.

But this doesn’t give much instruction on how to actually implement ESG considerations into stock picking analysis, quantitative modelling or risk management from an analysts perspective, be they an external provider or internal funds manager.

This is the logic behind the idea by Louise O’Hallaran, executive director of the Responsible Investment Association Australasia (RIAA), to set up a Responsible Investment Academy.

Sponsored Content

Using some face-to-face technology, and embracing web technology, the Academy will offer a series of progressive, multi-media training courses, starting with professional development seminars that will be rolled out before the end of this year, spurred by the assistance of the Australian Government’s A$2.5 million ($2 million) financial commitment over three years.

With a global reach, the Academy will be managed by the RIAA and governed by an Australian and international advisory council, chaired by Steve Gibbs, who was also a representative on the UNPRI steering committee and global investor group that set up the principles.

According to Gibbs, while there has been great interest in the principles, there is a significant gap in how to implement them.

The aim is a formal academic-level training program available for investment professionals to develop skills in this area, will help in the implementation and development of the principles.

Indeed the PRI says: “for institutional investors to make these Principles work, they will need to encourage a change in the way that their agents incorporate ESG issues into their processes”.

According to Gibbs the Academy will provide responsible investment research, policy and innovation and in particular provide investment professionals with a structured education and training program on key responsible investment risks, opportunities and concepts.

Funds manager analysts and brokers will be the main focus of the program, but it will extend to business development managers, as well as pension fund staff and trustees.

“I think even if internal fund staff and trustees knew the questions to ask, they wouldn’t know if they were getting the right answer,” Gibbs says.

Since the Australian Government’s commitment to the academy, Gibbs and his advisory council, made up of industry and investor representatives, have been developing the curriculum and deciding on the best delivery mechanisms.

While the academy has decided on an online delivery provider, the decision whether to partner with a tertiary education facility has not yet been made.

“On one hand it would be better not to, as we are looking at developing very practical courses,” he says.

It is expected that professional development seminars will be held before the end of the year, but Gibbs says it is a two-year project to fully develop the course.

Gordon Noble, principal at Responsible Investment Consulting, is the project officer.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

European distressed debt: investors divided by volatility

Last month conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com hosted a thinktank with a group of influential Australian investors to discuss the opportunities in European distressed debt. Participants included the Australian Government’s $80 billion sovereign wealth Future Fund, the $68 billion QIC, and leading asset consultants, with guest speaker sir David Cooksey, former board member of the Bank of England, chairman

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Previous