…as management costs creep up on OMERS

The $48.4 billion OMERS, which plans to have 90 per cent of assets directly managed by 2012, increased its investment management expenses in 2009 by 8 per cent, a figure it claims is offset by lower investment operating and third-party manager expenses.

Investment management expenses were $246 million in 2009, compared with $227 million in 2008, with the majority of the increase due to salary expenses.

Of the total investment management expenses for the year, $100 million were in salaries, which was significantly more than in 2008 when $76 million was spent on salaries.

Travel and communication was also up, from $7 million to $9 million, and system development and other purchased services increased from $11 million to $14 million in the year.

Investment operating and manager expenses decreased from $114 to $110 million over the year.

Sponsored Content

At the end of 2009 about 80 per cent of assets were managed directly, compared with about 70 per cent at the end of 2008.

The fund is also plans to enhance investment returns and better manage risks by implementing an enterprise-wide “direct drive” active management strategy which will increase the level of direct active management of investments.

According to OMERS’ annual report, the board believes that active asset management produces superior risk-adjusted returns compared with passive investing, and this includes originating investments through proprietary research.

This was seen in a number of ways across the OMERS businesses, including OMERS Capital Markets repatriating more than $2 billion from external managers in 2009, to establish an internally managed global equity portfolio and tactical portfolio to provide asset mix flexibility and substantially increase the debt of its investment research team.

OMERS has a long-term asset allocation weighted 53 per cent to public market investments and 47 per cent to private market investments and, at the end of 2009 private market investments represented about 39.1 per cent, compared with 39.8 per cent in 2008.

At the end of December the fund had 60.9 per cent in public markets, 10.2 per cent in private equity, 15.7 per cent in infrastructure and 13.2 per cent in real estate.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Washington reviews governance, pay and in-house investment

The pay levels, amount of in-house investment activity and governance structure of the $83 billion Washington State Investment Board (WSIB) may be under review following a rigorous debate that included a presentation to the board by KPA Advisory’s Keith Ambachtsheer.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

PRI calls for academics to fill ESG research gaps

Responsible investment research has reached a “tipping point” in its development, says the PRI’s director of strategic development, Rob Lake, and it needs to be more closely aligned to the practical needs of front-line investors.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Top1000funds.com brings some of the world’s largest investors together in Beijing

More than 70 investors representing more than $3.1 trillion in pension, endowment and sovereign fund capital will converge on Beijing on Sunday for the first Top1000funds Fiduciary Investors Symposium.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

HOOPP splits investment functions as Keohane appointed to top job

The $35.7 billion Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP) will split its chief investment officer function in two following the appointment of Jim Keohane to president and chief executive and the retirement of John Crocker.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

No rewards as systemic risk and turbulence ratings soar

The market is reflecting a high state of systemic risk and turbulence, and investors should adjust their allocation to growth assets accordingly, says Lucas Turton, chief investment strategist of Windham Capital Management.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Why institutions trade their reputations for profit

It is a key assumption that financial institutions such as auditing firms and credit ratings agencies will act in an ethical way to protect their reputation because it is, ultimately, the source of their profitability. But groundbreaking work by Harvard University postdoctoral fellow Abigail Brown posits that institutions may actually be incentivised to cyclically “trade

Previous