Now this is a merger: NZ mulls mega-fund

The New Zealand government could create a single NZ$40 billion ($30 billion) fund under a proposal mooted in its inaugural ‘Investment Statement’ published this month.

If adopted, the proposal – classified as one of the “high level choices in the financial portfolio” – would impose a central investment structure across all Crown Financial Institutions (CFI), which include the $13 billion New Zealand Superannuation Fund and the $9.7 billion Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) fund.

“At present the five CFIs are separate entities,” the government Investment Statement says. “A single fund manager across CFIs might increase efficiency and overall performance, and enable better aggregate risk management across the financial portfolio.”

As well as the ACC and NZ Super funds, CFIs also include the $4.5 billion Earthquake Corporation (EQC) fund and the $2.2 billion Government Superannuation Fund (GSF).

While classed as a CFI, the $1.35 billion National Provident Fund manages the private savings of individuals across several industry groups and falls under the government purview because it carries a Crown guarantee.

A spokesperson for the office of Finance Minister Bill English said the options included in the Investment Statement represented an “initial stocktake” of Crown assets and were not government policy.

Sponsored Content

“No decisions have been made or any in-depth analysis of the pros and cons [of creating a single CFI fund] has been carried out,” the spokesperson said.

Paul Dyer, economic adviser to Bill English, formerly held high-level investment positions at both NZ Super and the ACC fund.

The Investment Statement, also reveals the government would review the size and asset mix of the EQC fund (officially called the National Disaster Fund or NDF) following the massive earthquake that hit Christchurch this September.

“Both issues will need to be reassessed in the light of the Canterbury earthquake, which is likely to result in payments from the NDF of up to $1.1 billion,” the Investment Statement says.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous