Not drowning, waving: quants on the comeback trail

Quantitative investing has taken a battering during the global financial crisis, with many big firms suffering lower-than-average performance for much of the past two years. But the stuff that gave quants a compelling story before  investor behavioural biases – is now helping them again.

With a return to normality in markets, quant managers have in recent months started to better exploit the long-run performance qualities of value, growth and momentum styles.

According to Didier Rosenfeld, the head of EAFE and global equity strategies for State Street Global Advisors (SSGA), the factors which have served quant managers well for years were again starting to work as economies stabilise.

“The long-term thesis on quant performance remains compelling, he told a client conference.

However there are a few things which quant managers could do to reduce the risk of underperformance during turning points in the market.

Sponsored Content

Quant models needed to become more sophisticated in their use of factors, Rosenfeld said. Quants also needed to invest in quality data inputs and they needed to be more thorough in reviewing and using their models.

Rosenfeld suggested that quants should consider introducing more dynamism into their processes. For example, when price momentum factors have had a good run, maybe the manager could take some risk off the table.

“The investment in research is paramount for quants, he said. “They have to invest in robust processes.

A simple quant model of 50 per cent value and 50 per cent momentum would have provided consistent outperformance over the long sample period of 1968-2009, except for around the time of the tech bubble in 2000-2001.

Rosenfeld said the current environment provided considerable opportunity for alpha generation by quant managers.

Valuation factors had historically provided strong outperformance after big market corrections. Stock dispersion was currently at its highest level since the late 1990s and book-to-price dispersion was at its highest level since 2000.

The client conference was held in Sydney on October 28.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous