New method for incentive compensation at CalPERS

CalPERS is contemplating an incentive schedule for senior investment executives that builds in downside risk, by expanding the range of the factor multipliers for the quantitative elements of investment performance plans, a move which could potentially eliminate a small compensation incentive award.


Staff were asked to present sample data reflecting an incentive schedule for demonstration purposes at the August performance and compensation committee, for the quantitative elements of investment performance plans that would build in downside risk by expanding the range from the existing 0 to 1.5 to -1.0 to 2.5.

Michael Schlachter, managing director of Wilshire, presented projected estimated changes in the incentive compensation if the factor multipliers were changed, based on December 2008 performance.

The analysis, which looked at expanded ranges of -1.0 to 2.5, and -2.0 to 3.5, showed that a small incentive compensation award under the current methodology would be eliminated under the expansion of the ranges, for the chief investment officer and investment staff.

For some staff, including asset allocation, risk management, AIM, and fixed income portfolio managers, the new ranges would result in a negative award, because of the structure of their incentive program.

However these changes would only effect the quantitative element of the incentive program, which makes up 75 per cent for most investment staff.

Sponsored Content

The chief investment officer, Joe Dear, is awarded incentive compensation based on 25 per cent leadership factors (qualitative) with the remaining 75 per cent quantitatively based on the performance over a designated benchmark of the total fund (40 per cent) and each of the five major investment divisions (7 per cent each).

In minutes of the performance and compensation committee, chief of the human resources division, Chris O’Brien recommended approving the second reading of the performance plans for the 2009-2010 fiscal year for the chief investment officer, chief operating investment officer, senior investment officers, senior portfolio managers and portfolio managers.

Under goal IV of CalPERS’ strategic plan, the organisation is dedicated to effectively utilising its resources, including a diverse, creative, motivated, high performance workplace. This can be accomplished at the highest executive levels through the establishment of methods that provide broad flexibility in the recruitment, retention and compensation of key personnel.

Wilshire is in the process of calculating actual fiscal year 2009 incentive compensation.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous