Large hedge funds to dominate as banks, small funds withdraw

Large, diversified hedge funds with institutional-quality operations are more likely to survive their smaller rivals as the sector continues to contract, according to a research note by Morgan Stanley.

Larger, institutional-quality managers are expected to gain market share as smaller funds continue to shut-down – a process that appears to be accelerating, Morgan Stanley writes in a January 2009 Investment Focus note.

The larger managers are more likely to commit resources to compliance and operational infrastructure than their smaller rivals as regulation of financial markets continues to evolve.

New, increasingly demanding regulation will also limit the ability of smaller managers to exploit investment opportunities.

While larger managers can also build customised trading programs to adjust to changing regulation, smaller firms must often wait for off-the-shelf trading programs to be modified by vendors.

Sponsored Content

“Institutional-quality managers, who typically possess more sophisticated risk infrastructures, have the ability to pursue non-standard means to hedge exposures and, thus, can capitalise on the greater inefficiencies created by new regulatory restrictions,” Morgan Stanley states.

The surviving hedge funds will find themselves with fewer competitors as banks, under pressure to reduce leverage and, by extension, proprietary risk-taking operations, withdraw from markets in which they once competed with hedge funds.

“While the outlook on near-term returns for hedge funds remains unclear, we believe that opportunities are abundant for investors with a longer-term time horizon to take advantage of significant distortions in the market.”

Such opportunities exist in the convertible arbitrage, bank loan and investment-grade corporate bond markets, Morgan Stanley writes.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

European distressed debt: investors divided by volatility

Last month conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com hosted a thinktank with a group of influential Australian investors to discuss the opportunities in European distressed debt. Participants included the Australian Government’s $80 billion sovereign wealth Future Fund, the $68 billion QIC, and leading asset consultants, with guest speaker sir David Cooksey, former board member of the Bank of England, chairman

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Previous