Jeff Scott takes on risky business as Wurts’ inaugural CIO

A common belief in the value of a risk-based approach to asset allocation, and a courtship of eight months, has culminated in Jeff Scott being appointed the first chief investment officer of US consulting firm, Wurts & Associates. Scott, (pictured) who as chief investment officer of the $39 billion Alaska Permanent Fund, has revitalised and reformed the sovereign wealth fund’s approach to asset allocation, predicated his move to Wurts on ensuring the completion of a number of projects at the APFC, including a five-year strategic plan.

Scott will join Wurts in August, charged with managing the $1.2 billion in discretionary investment solutions, and developing an asset allocation framework based on risk analysis.

Max Giolitti, APFC’s director of asset allocation and risk who has worked with Scott at various institutions since 1998, will also be joining Wurts as director of risk allocation.

“The more time I spent with Jeff MacLean over the past eight months the more I realised there are consulting firms that do think outside the box, that realise standard deviation does not equal risk, and that valuations matter,” Scott said. “Wurts has a strategist on the payroll who writes opinion pieces about valuations, that’s refreshing.”

Chief executive of Wurts & Associates, Jeff MacLean, was passionate about the benefits of a risk-based approach to asset allocation, and called the mean variance optimisation followed by most investors “flawed at its core”.

“How people are allocating assets today is flawed at its core. The problem and the reality is that those responsible for trillions of dollars are using mean variance optimisation as a method. If you don’t understand the embedded risks you are doomed for failure,” he said.

Sponsored Content

“Jeff Scott has been thinking about risks not assets, and breaking that down, for years. We are building a business on a long-term basis on what’s right for the customer and the right way to manage assets. There are not enough people in our business willing to stand up and say this is the right way to do it. The enlightened plan sponsors appreciate the risk-based approach and the value of asset allocation and I believe over time the whole market will move to this approach.”

MacLean said most investors acknowledged the degree to which return came from asset allocation but they spent less than 2 per cent on asset allocation.

The appointment was part of the firm’s plans to expand its discretionary business, providing customised solutions for funds which would turn over their assets to the firm, with the consulting fee a percentage of assets.

“The right way to supervise and manage institutional assets is through a discretionary approach, the wisdom of this approach will become obvious. Funds will look to outsource and we will hire and deploy alpha or beta based on a strategy to meet their liabilities. Our strategy is premised on the fact one size does not fit all,” MacLean said.

Scott said that while he was reluctant at first to move from the CIO position at Alaska, he believed the fund was now through “the critical phase”.

“We have a new governance policy, a new risk-based investment policy, automated comprehensive risk platforms which are produced by the finance team, and the external CIO program has been in place for 18 months. The impact of that has been profound, trustees love the program,” Scott said.

For the past four months, the board and executive team of APFC had been working on a five-year strategic plan, which Scott said was CIO agnostic, and which tackled among other things diversification and fees.

“The board is aware their asset allocation lacks diversification, we measured it in 10 ways, and we are working on that. I love this job, and working with the trustees, and I want to make sure this happens.”

 

To read a profile on the Alaska Permanent Fund detailing its risk-based approach to asset allocation click here

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous