Investors take strong action on climate risk

One year after a ground-breaking Mercer report into the potential impact of climate change on portfolio performance, more than half of investor participants have decided to include climate change considerations into risk management and/or strategic asset allocation decisions.

A new Mercer survey, of 12 investors involved in the original report, also revealed that half of investors have either already undertaken or plan to make changes to their actual asset allocation as a result of the report.

More than half of participants either have or plan to review climate risk within climate-sensitive asset classes identified in the report.

While one-third of participants have also begun to allocate to more “climate sensitive” assets, the original report’s project manager and primary researcher, Dr Danyelle Guyatt, says that there are still limited opportunities for investors to invest in areas where capital is needed.

Guyatt says that in areas such as energy efficiency and waste and water management, investors need to work with not only policy makers, but also asset managers to create focused products.

“When you break down the opportunities across the asset classes there are not that many investment funds available that focus on the areas that pension fund assets need to go to,” Guyatt says.

Sponsored Content

Guyatt says that more collaboration is needed between funds to help create the kinds of investment opportunities.

Last year Guyatt took up a position at Australian superannuation fund Catholic Super, where she says she is looking to practically implement some of the findings of the report.

“As an industry we still need to do a lot of work with fund managers and, perhaps even together, to develop the solutions so we can actually put our capital to work,” she says.

Guyatt notes that in a low returns environment and with uncertainty in equity markets, potential green investments of this type can be attractive as a general diversifier of risk, not just as climate change-linked investments.

Swedish pension fund Forsta AP-fonden (AP1) says in the Mercer survey detailing participant action that the original 2011 report “strengthened the fund’s conviction in the necessity of increasing the share of real assets in the portfolio”.

The fund has already made decisions to increase its exposure to agricultural land and timberland.

It is also looking at real estate and infrastructure opportunities but says it is working through various ESG issues before increasing its investments further.

Mercer found that the participants were galvanised to further strengthen their engagements with both governments and companies as a result of the original report. More than 80 per cent of participants have or will increase their engagement.

The project and subsequent action to integrate climate change considerations into investment decision making has also been taken up at a high level by participants.

Participants typically reported that investment risk and asset allocation departments and responsible investment or ESG staff took a lead role in this process

But 42 per cent of participant chief investment officers also reporting having some involvement.

There was a more limited involvement from front-line investment staff.

Almost all of the investors involved in the original report have either plan to or already have updated the board on the findings of the study.

The Mercer survey identifies areas of future action and concludes that the various scenarios for action on climate change and the subsequent risks and opportunities inherent in each potential outcome need updating.

The report notes that the latest outcome from climate talks in Durban increased the likelihood of “regionally divergent” approaches to action on climate change.

This divergence was predicted to create more uncertainty and volatility for investors, than a scenario where countries took concerted, coordinated action.

Like Guyatt, the report also calls for more effective ways to allocate capital to climate sensitive assets, which could require the development of innovative investment vehicles.

The original report states that climate change could contribute 10 per cent of risk to a representative portfolio.

Mercer in its latest report notes that while climate change risk management is developing rapidly, it still represents “nowhere near 10 per cent of the average risk manager’s budget or attention”.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous