Investors must lift ESG reporting standards: MSCI

Remy Briand

As MSCI moves to expand its sustainability research capability to emerging markets, its global head of index and ESG research, Remy Briand, has urged investors to dramatically improve their reporting standards to make good on their ESG cause.The broadening of MSCI’s environmental, social and governance (ESG) research into emerging markets would enable investors benchmarked to global indexes, such as the MSCI All-Country World Index, to better incorporate ESG risks in their portfolios, Briand said.

MSCI already runs a series of 23 ESG indexes for the MSCI World index, plus various countries and industries. But its acquisition of RiskMetrics, including governance specialist ISS Proxy and sustainability researcher Innovest Strategic Value Advisors, gave it a foothold in the ESG ratings market.

It has since learned that while asset owners are pressuring funds managers to take ESG risks into account, many were not fulfilling their part of the deal by providing detailed ESG reporting at the portfolio level, Briand said.

“They ask managers to manage ESG, but they’re not looking at how they’re doing.”

Reporting by asset owners provided crucial feedback for managers and stakeholders, Briand said. Without it, claims that ESG risks are taken seriously ring hollow.

As a research provider, MSCI saw reporting as important because it helped improve their offering.

Sponsored Content

“We need to understand how people are integrating ESG, because it’s not necessarily done systematically,” Briand said.

Worldwide, a shift in the ESG movement was underway, he said.  Investors were moving from a “value-based” approach – in which certain industries, such as weapons manufacturing or pornography, were strictly off-limits – to an “integration” approach that took ESG risks into account – but did not set hard-and-fast rules about which companies were forbidden.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous