Investors’ group challenges EU on climate change

Ole Sorensen

The Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change will present a position paper to the European Commission this week, giving momentum to the dialogue between investors and policy makers, and offering a united institutional investors’ voice on the requirements for the successful mobilisation of private investment in climate change mitigation. Amanda White talks with the chair of the IIGCC, Ole Sorensen (pictured).

A report on “Shifting private capital to low carbon investment” addressing climate change and energy policy at a European level presented by the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC) to the European Commission this week signifies an evolution in investor communication with the European Commission.

Ole Beier Sorensen, chief of department, research and strategy at ATP and chair of the IIGCC says this is a significant step in the life of the organisation.

“We try to provide a joint platform and a unified voice into the debate and policy process. The IIGCC report marks the potential for change in communication and we hope a platform for a continued dialogue with relevant European institutions,” he says.

The IIGCC membership, of 65 investors, includes large pension fund investors such as ATP, APG Asset Management, the Universities Superannuation Scheme, the Swedish National Pension Funds 1-4, and PGGM Investments, and asset managers such as BlackRock, HSBC, and Schroders.

The purpose of the report, Sorensen says, is to outline the message that the key to combating climate change lies with private investors, but the investments needed cannot be mobilised at the scale and pace needed unless it is assisted by a sustained, credible long-term policy framework.

Sponsored Content

“The combat to counter climate change will be won or lost in the hands of private investors, but we need clear frameworks and as is well-known, so much in this field is policy driven,” he says.

“Our feeling is there is a very strong willingness on behalf of the EU to enter in a dialogue on this.”

The European Commission certainly has climate change firmly on its agenda, testament to that is the speech by Janez Potocnik, European Commissioner for the Environment at the Green Alliance Conference in London last week. To read “Europe: Looking ahead on climate change” click here. (H:\top1000\2010\Sept22\EUclimate change.htm)

But Europe does face some short- and mid-term obstacles that Sorensen and his peers are firmly aware of.

“The climate is changing, but there is a complicated situation in Europe, and there are still significant uncertainties with respect to the way forward. And the current financial crisis doesn’t make things easier. While some countries are firmly behind a more ambitious 30 per cent target for 2020, others may rely heavily on high carbon-intensive industries and energy and they may have other mid- and short-term considerations, it is complex,” Sorensen says.

ATP, for whom Sorensen works, has sizeable climate change investments on a number of levels. Being a very large Danish pension fund, it is overexposed to Danish industry, which he says has a significant overrepresentation of companies engaged in climate relevant activities such as insulation, water pumps, biofuels and wind farms.

In addition the fund made a commitment to allocate €1 billion to climate change activities in developing countries within three years.

While Sorensen says that commitment still remains, the fund realises it may take more time.

“Copenhagen didn’t deliver as expected, so we haven’t seen the development of national action plans at quite the pace expected,” he says. “For deal flow to pick up, it must be policy driven but that is not happening nearly to the extent that we hoped. We just don’t see hundreds of large-scale projects calling for funding and we expect it will take more time to invest the €1 billion.

Sorensen says 85 per cent of investment must come from private sources, and half of that must take place in emerging countries with the lion’s share relating to China, India, Indonesia, Brazil and South Africa.

One response to “Investors’ group challenges EU on climate change”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous