Financial health reports essential says Mercer

After the damage of the global financial crisis, funds should be submitting themselves for voluntary financial health checks to diagnose vulnerabilities and pinpoint risks, asset consulting firm Mercer says.  Darren Wickham (pictured), principal in Mercer’s retirement, risk and finance business, said risk profiles would increase as the population ages and members begin to draw-down.

But, there was no need to “reinvent the wheel” in designing more robust risk management tools, Wickham said.

Financial condition tools already existed for general, health and life insurers to identify dormant risk areas, and these could readily be used to assess funds’ financial health or sickness.

Wickham said funds must assess four areas: financial strength, fund sustainability, risk, and stress.

First, financial strength assessment at balance date included reserves, liquidity, and strength of service providers.

Second, fund sustainability modelling examined areas such as: exit rates, profiling of those exiting, inactive vs active, pension takeup rates, and investment options used.

Sponsored Content

Third, risk review for a financial condition report included a consideration of the fund’s experience of risks and compliance failures during the past year.

And fourth, stress testing included deep-dives into liquidity and unit pricing.

For liquidity, Mercer had developed tools to examine the impact of various short- and medium-term scenarios, Wickham said.

For unit pricing stresses, Wickham said, Mercer’s experience in unit pricing and custody/operations was applied to identify problems before they became substantial rectification costs for the fund.

When applied to investments, good governance contributed to performance, Wickham said, citing Ambachtsheer research (Ambachtsheer Letter, no.245, June 2006) which showed annual increased returns of up to 3 per cent due to better decision-making.

At least five benefits flowed from a financial condition report, Wickham said.

1.       A sophisticated management report which befitted the increasing complexity of funds

2.       A level of comfort about the risks provided by an external expert

3.       Insights into behaviour of members which allowed funds to tailor communications, products and services

4.       Modelling of the fund for strategy, examining fee basis sustainability, and setting reserves

5.       Due diligence in preparation for possible mergers of funds

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

European distressed debt: investors divided by volatility

Last month conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com hosted a thinktank with a group of influential Australian investors to discuss the opportunities in European distressed debt. Participants included the Australian Government’s $80 billion sovereign wealth Future Fund, the $68 billion QIC, and leading asset consultants, with guest speaker sir David Cooksey, former board member of the Bank of England, chairman

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Previous