European pension funds have blinkered view of risk

The liability-hedging portfolio of European pension funds is imprecisely modelled at nearly half of the pension funds as measured in a EDHEC-Risk Institute survey.The survey, which covered 129 asset/liability management specialists, from pension funds, their advisers, regulators and funds managers, found the majority of respondents have a blinkered view of their risks.

Accounting risk, the volatility from the pension fund in the sponsor’s books, is managed by only 33 per cent of respondents, and more than 50 per cent ignore sponsor risk, or the risk of a bankrupt sponsor leaving a pension fund with deficits.

The author of the report, Samuel Sender, who is applied research manager at EDHEC-Risk Institute, said the first challenge for a pension fund involves meeting its liability by fully or partially hedging it away.

He said the second challenge for pension funds is to gain access to performance through optimal diversification within and between asset classes.

“Most respondents use market indices to define the investment benchmarks of investment funds, even though market indices are weighted by capitalisation and are known to be highly inefficient.

“Additionally even though they are the longest-term investors and are not subject to liquidity risk, pension funds invest relatively little in potentially illiquid assets and therefore do not benefit from the related risk premium.”

Sponsored Content

The last challenge for pension funds, he said, was to respect their minimum funding ratios by insuring risks away.

To manage the prudential constraints, 28 per cent of respondents use risk-controlled investing strategies, and 56 per cent use economic/regulatory capital.

“Like RCI economic capital relies on the measure of risk budget and of a surplus. Economic capital, however involves a discretionary, rather than a rule-based, investment strategy and possible delays.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous