Dutch giant see-saws to recovery

The precarious seesaw that is pension fund asset-liability management is demonstrated in the latest results of the giant Dutch pension fund, ABP, with the fund’s coverage ratio falling, despite positive investment returns, and the fund being only slighly ahead of its recovery schedule.

In the first six months of this year the fund’s pension liabilities rose €28 billion due to a historically low interest rate level of 3.2 per cent, compared to 3.9 per cent for 2009. The fund now has €218 billion ($282 billion) in capital.

This means that for the fund’s recovery plan, ABP is only slightly ahead of schedule, and a higher level of funds will need to be set aside to pay future payments.

In March 2009 the fund submitted a recovery plan to De Nederlandsche Bank, when a drop in the actuarial interest rate at the end of 2008 to 3.6 per cent, and a return on investments for the year of -20.2 per cent meant the fund’s coverage ratio had fallen to 90 per cent.

At the end of 2007, the fund had a coverage ratio of 140 per cent; with an actuarial interest rate of 4.9 per cent and a return on investments of 3.8 per cent. Once the coverage ratio falls below 105 per cent the fund is required to report to the Bank on its plan to eliminate the underfunding within three years, and that the value of the assets will be on the level specified by the Pensions Act within 15 years.

The fund has allocated almost 4 per cent more to fixed income in the first half of this year, compared with 2009, with the allocation to real assets being reduced.

Sponsored Content

Real assets incorporates developed and emerging market equities, real estate, private equity, alternative inflation, opportunity fund, illiquid commodities, and infrastructure.

ABP investment portfolio

First half of 2010 2009
Asset class weight % return % weight % return %
Fixed income 42.3 4.1 38.7
12.7
Treasuries 10.2 3.0 9.0 5.5
Index Linked Bonds 8.3 -0.2 8.7 11.2
Fixed income credits 23.8 6.3 21.0 16.1
Real assets 51.8 1.0 54.7 24.6
Developed market equities 23.7 -2.8 29.8 30.0
Emerging market equities 6.0 9.0 5.7 74.1
Real estate 7.9 1.7 7.5 13.2
Private equity 5.4 13.7 4.4 8.2
Alternative inflation 4.8 -4.8 * *
Opportunity fund 3.3 1.7 * *
Illiquid commodities * 0.4 -1.6 * *
Infrastructure 0.3 15.2 -4.8 -0.1
Other investments 6.4 5.7 6.3 10.8
Hedge funds* 4.3 8.9 * *
Global TAA* 2.1 0.0 * *
Overlay -0.5 1.9 0.3 0.9
Overlay –duration 2.6 1.9 0.8 -0.4
Overlay – cash and other -3.1 0.1 -0.5 1.3
100.0 4.6 100.0 20.2

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous