DB beats DC in unequal race

The average corporate defined-benefit plan in the US has outperformed the Callan DC index by 1.61 per cent since 2006, although this is partly due to a difference in fee reporting.

Since the index’s inception five years ago, the index has reported annualised returns of 3.14 per cent, while the average corporate defined benefit plan has reported 4.75 per cent.

Corporate defined-benefit funds report returns gross of fees while the returns of the Callan DC index are net of fees.

The Callan DC index, which is an equally weighted index tracking the cash flows and performance of more than 70 DC plans and $80 billion in assets, shows that assets in the index have grown 6.34 per cent since inception, divided equally between positive performance and net inflows from plan sponsors and participant contributions.

Flow analysis shows that target date funds and domestic fixed income were the biggest beneficiaries for the year to the end of December 2010, while domestic large-cap equity, international equity and stable value all experienced outflows for the year.

The share of equity funds in the index grew in the year, from 62.5 to 64.9 per cent, but below the index’s all-time high of 70.5 per cent at the end of 2006.

Sponsored Content

Callan DC Index asset allocation as at December 31, 2010

Target date funds 10.5%
Brokerage window 1.5%
Company stock 6.9%
Domestic fixed income 9.3%
Domestic large cap 24.1%
Domestic small/mid cap 10.6%
Domestic/global balanced 12.2%
Emerging markets equity 0.4%
International/global equity 7.7%
Money market 3.1%
Stable value 12.2%
Other 1.5%

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

OMERS’ new CIO to focus on in-house management

Bringing externally managed funds under the guidance of the internal investment team is a key component of OMERS’ growth plans, with the fund moving to having more direct control over its investments, according to new chief investment officer, Michael Latimer. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

The hidden risks of risk parity portfolios

The benefits of risk parity portfolios are largely an illusion and contain hidden risks such as confusing volatility with risk and including asset classes that have significant negative skew, which combined with leverage could be painful for investors, according to director of asset allocation at GMO, Ben Inker. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Performance-based pay should be abolished: ICGN

Non-executive directors’ pay should consist solely of a combination of a cash retainer and equity-based remuneration, according to the International Corporate Governance Network’s new guidelines for non-executive director pay crafted over the past several years in consultation with, and on behalf of, many of the largest global shareowners. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Abu Dhabi fund doubles revenue in 2009

Abu Dhabi’s (AED88.5) $24 billion strategic investment arm, Mubadala Development, reaped nearly twice as much revenue from portfolio companies in 2009 than in the previous year. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

High FX costs drag on returns

Higher than expected foreign exchange transaction costs can result in a long-term return drag on a portfolio of up to 2 per cent over 40 years according to new research by Russell Investments, which urges investors to review and measure foreign exchange costs. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Diversity is power, says Zink

A typical pension fund portfolio is so dominated by equity risk that returns will fluctuate widely according to economic conditions which affect equity markets. Amanda White spoke to Rob Zink, portfolio strategist and now consultant for Bridgewater Associates about why most investors have a flawed approach to asset allocation. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous