CPPIB changes asset weights, expands risk management…

The C$105 billion Canada Public Pension Investment Board (CPPIB) has adjusted the investment allocations in its reference portfolio, including an increased foreign exposure, and made significant risk management enhancements, as a response to the volatile economic environment and its long-term asset-liability matching.

Three years ago the CPP Reference Portfolio, a low-cost, low-complexity portfolio that could easily be expected to meet the needs of the pension plan, was created as the benchmark for the CPP Fund. Taking a total portfolio approach, the CPPIB adds value above this portfolio by investing in better beta, through asset diversification, as well as alpha.

In fiscal 2009, which the CPPIB measures to the end of March, a number of changes were made to the reference portfolio including a gradual reduction in the Canadian equities exposure from 25 to 15 per cent, and a reduction in the Canadian real return bond weighting from 10 to 5 per cent. The foreign equity exposure was increased by 5 per cent to 45 per cent, with new allocations of 5 per cent each allocated to emerging market equities and foreign sovereign bonds. The allocation to Canadian nominal fixed income remains at 25 per cent.

All foreign equity exposures are unhedged, but the bond allocation is hedged.

According to the CPPIB annual report, in fiscal 2009, the return of the CPP Fund, matched the reference portfolio benchmark with 1 basis point of added return. However the board takes a long-term attitude to performance, with the focus of returns on four-year periods, not one year. In the three years since the reference portfolio was established as the total fund benchmark, 487 basis points have been added. From next year the performance will be measured on a rolling four-year basis.

In the past year the CPP Fund differed slightly in its asset allocation from the reference portfolio. In aggregate the fund had a 57.4 per cent allocation to equities, split between public equities (44 per cent) and private equities (13.4 per cent) versus a total equities allocation of 65 per cent in the reference portfolio. Fixed income allocations totalled 27.9 per cent versus 30 per cent in the reference portfolio. And 1.7 per cent was allocated absolute return strategies. One of the stronger sources of value-added returns was a 14.7 per cent allocation to inflation-sensitive assets.

Sponsored Content

During the year, the board also introduced new investment risk management systems and a comprehensive review of its enterprise risk management framework.

Each year the board approves an active risk limit which restricts management’s discretion to vary its aggregate risk exposure from the reference portfolio. The chief executive, David Denison, and senior management members are accountable for managing an active risk budget, with active risk allocated to the investment departments to divide among various categories of actively managed investments.

In the past year the CPPIB has separated the allocation and monitoring of risk, with the oversight responsibilities transferred to the investment risk management group within the treasury, risk, operations and technology department. The portfolio design and investment research department previously held this function.

The position of vice president, portfolio strategies was created within this portfolio design department, with the aim of identifying emerging risk factors that should be integrated into the portfolio design.

In addition a head of investment risk management was created to consolidate risk measurement, monitoring and control functions within a dedicated team.

Active and total portfolio risk is measured daily and reported to the investment planning committee weekly and to the board at least quarterly.

In what was a busy year for the CPPIB, its operations were expanded internationally with new offices in London and Hong Kong, as well as Toronto, employing 490 full time staff.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous