Co-investment opportunities come to the fore

The distress in the financial markets is offering Australian superannuation funds good opportunities to achieve a higher internal rate of return (IRR) on quality assets purchased directly.

Sam Magee, commercial director at Australian investment manager Industry Funds Management (IFM), told the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds (CMSF) held in Australia this week, that there are now more opportunities to buy quality assets at a better price.

“With more distressed sellers, more sellers and less buyers, you can get better IRR out of the market,” Magee said.

Magee said direct investment was about more than just paying the most cash to win the asset, and it was critical to know when to walk away from a deal.

“There is no shame in walking away from the wrong deal,” he said. “The alternative could be losing potentially millions if the asset doesn’t stack up to the valuation.”

Sponsored Content

Co-investment with other institutional investors can help to balance the portfolio and provide access to quality deals, Magee said.

However super funds must “vet potential co-investment partners, to ensure their interests are aligned with the other investors entering the consortium.

Potentially dangerous co-investors include conflicted investors, who are not necessarily driven by the return on equity, those who are politically sensitive, and “goughing” co-investors – who are heavily focused on fees.

Preferred co-investors are those that do not charge upfront or ongoing fees; do not have conflicts of interest; and that share an aligned view about getting the deal done.

Selecting the right advisers on the deal is just as important as choosing the right co-investors, and once the deal is done, the asset must be reviewed regularly, Magee said.

IFM has invested A$1.5 billion purchasing interests in 45 assets around the world.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous