Clash of the titans: investors and managers at odds over alternatives regulation

A battle has broken out between investors and suppliers over the regulation of hedge fund and private equity managers, with opposing testimony given to the US Senate by the country’s largest pension fund, the $180.9 billion CalPERS, and a US-based venture capital firm. In this “Have Your Say” column we ask you whether you agree with CalPERS that all hedge fund managers raising capital in the US should be forced to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), or whether you think the current regulations are sufficient.

Testifying to the US Senate banking subcommittee on securities, insurance and investment recently on regulating
hedge funds and other private investment pools, Joe Dear, chief investment officer of CalPERS recommended that all investment managers raising funds in the US be forced to register with the SEC and be subject to its oversight.

However Trevor Loy, founder and general partner of Flywheel Ventures, a venture capital firm based in New Mexico, argued in his testimony that venture capital should be exempt from the requirement to register with the SEC under
the Investment Advisers Act and that additional SEC registration requirements could hamper venture activity.

He said that the venture capital industry’s activities were “not interwoven with US financial markets” and that
venture capital investment does not qualify as posing systemic risk for the following reasons:

*Venture capital firms are not interdependent with the world financial system

Sponsored Content

*The venture capital industry is small in size

*Venture capital firms do not use long-term leverage or rely on short-term funding

“We do recognise the need for transparency into our activities and, in that spirit, venture firms have provided information to the SEC for decades,” he said.

“We believe this information remains sufficient to meet the need for transparency without burdening our firms with additional regulations that do not further the understanding of systemic risk. We agree that those entities and industries which could cause financial system failure should be better monitored so that the events of 2008 are never repeated. However, venture capital is not one of those industries. Our size and operations within the private market do not pose broader financial risk.”

Should hedge fund managers be forced to register with the SEC?

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Governance foiled by human folly at NY state fund

The third largest fund in the US, the $122 billion New York state pension fund, has recently been embroiled in a tale of greed, fraud, bribery and corruption, with a number of its alternative investment funds allegedly tainted by the wrong-doing of former employees of the state comptroller’s officer, including its former CIO. In this

Maybe it’s time to get back into the water, with a life jacket

Institutional investors have never been market timers, but in this editorial, publisher of conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com, Greg Bright, argues maybe now is the time for pension plans to take a bet. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Volatility sparks complete risk management review at CalPERS

Turmoil in financial markets and the need for greater transparency has triggered a review of the $174 billion CalPERS’ existing governance and risk management framework, with a new ad hoc committee tasked with reviewing the risk management framework across the entire business. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

AustralianSuper aims for beta returns after big cuts to active equities

The A$28billion (US$20 billion) AustralianSuper terminated several mandates with active equities managers last week and directed most of the freed-up capital to passive exposures bringing its passive management in equities to more than 50 per cent, in an effort to simplify its portfolio by trimming excess managers. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Embrace risk in asset allocation

Investors should be wary of “new paradigm” arguments, according to the latest research by consulting firm Wurts & Associates, which reminds investors the forces driving capital markets rarely change, but the position within market cycles is ever changing. Wurts & Associates’ philosophy on strategic asset allocation is that static portfolio structure is an ineffective means

Index composition changes create opportunities for bond managers

Drastic changes to the composition of the US bond index, the Barclay’s Capital Aggregate Index, will create opportunities for active bond managers and provide rationale for institutional investors concerned about active management in the sector to adhere to their long-term asset allocation. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous